Thread: 69 L89 Chevelle
View Single Post
  #14  
Old 05-25-2019, 04:50 PM
L78M22Rag L78M22Rag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,518
Thanks: 1,561
Thanked 730 Times in 357 Posts
Default

In the video, Patrick talks about the car’s engine being dated the first week of March while the car’s built date was the fourth week of February. He speculates that the car was likely held up at the assembly line due to the rare parts being unavailable. With this car, and it’s condition, I must say that I’m not questioning the legitimacy of the motor being the original born with. Has anyone seen any other documented or bullet proof instances of born with motors that are dated after the car’s assembly date? That opens up a whole other can of worms...

I sure look forward to seeing more details about this car like the engine stamp, etc.
__________________
Helmut...
Never met a survivor I didn't like
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to L78M22Rag For This Useful Post:
purple panther (05-25-2019)