View Single Post
  #9  
Old 02-22-2024, 01:22 PM
Tracker1's Avatar
Tracker1 Tracker1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ONTARIO
Posts: 3,322
Thanks: 863
Thanked 888 Times in 438 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
I agree. Not much American iron from the malaise era I am interested in.

But.... if a 77 Z/28 came along for the right price, I would still consider it. For me, it meant GM wasn't "giving up" on performance. Yes, pretty anemic compared to pre-1973, and especially compared to today. But, it was the beginning of something special, where they decided you could do performance and comply with emissions. Rudimentary for certain, but within a few years, once computers and injection took over... wow.

Hate the giant bumpers, but at least the car doesn't look as bloated as the early 80s Camaros.
IMHO the Chevy division had thrown in the towel. The Pontiac/Firebird guys were still swinging for the fences, trying to figure out how to make the most of what they had and what they could get away with. The W72 400 (1977-79) and WS6 (1978-79) programs/options were a testament to that. Remember, the NHRA refactored the 1978 and 1979 version of the W72 to 260 net HP because they did not believe Pontiac's factory 220 horse net rating. And even keeping the 455 around in 1975 and 1976 showed they still loved performance and fought many a boardroom battle to keep it alive. A 1978 or 1979 (all W72s were 4-speeds in '79) Formula or Trans Am with the good W72 400 coupled with the WS6 handling package is a fine road car. In my first-hand experience and opinion, superior to any 70's Corvette for ride & handling. Just my .02 cents
__________________
I ain't nobody, dork.

Last edited by Tracker1; 02-22-2024 at 01:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Tracker1 For This Useful Post:
66cayne (02-22-2024), 69M22Z (02-22-2024), dustinm (02-22-2024), Lynn (02-22-2024), L_e_e (02-23-2024), Xplantdad (02-22-2024)