Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Lounge


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2009, 11:46 PM
69Tom 69Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 594
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default That's it for Chrysler?

How cow. I didn't realize they were even worse off than GM. It really looks like the brand is done for. Guess those wanting a new Challenger should get one, and soon.

Maybe someone with some more insight can comment.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/23/auto...ion=2009042311
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 04-24-2009, 12:13 AM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: That's it for Chrysler?

I swear, if I hear one more so called "reporter" parrot the phrase that the Big 3 produce "unappealing cars" I just might go crazy! Last I knew, the new Challenger had one heck of a buzz (even among the *non* car folks I know)...and they've only sold 1/3 the of the number of cars as this time last year? Well, DUH! Someone show me any other car company on this planet that isn't down huge numbers...the trendy "be all, end all" of cars known as the Toyota Prius is stacked up like cord wood in dealers around the country (and I read just this morning that Toyota announced a huge price slash just the price just to get them out of their inventory), yet all of these writers fail to mention that. But then again, what do I know, I'm just some dumb car guy...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-24-2009, 02:44 AM
gb70 gb70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Posts: 886
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: That's it for Chrysler?

Might be some smokin deals on the new Challengers sitting on dealers lots that have to go.

Really a sad situation though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-24-2009, 02:57 AM
370454s 370454s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Morrilton, Arkansas
Posts: 676
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: That's it for Chrysler?

Yeah, I might just buy another Challenger. Waited 4 Months for Black 09 Challenger R/T 6 Speed. Now I might just buy that 09 Hemi Orange SRT-8.
Mike
__________________
2010 Black Challenger SRT-8 6 Speed
2010 Purple Challenger R/T Classic
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-24-2009, 03:08 AM
gb70 gb70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Eagle, Idaho
Posts: 886
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: That's it for Chrysler?

Has anyone drove one of the SRT-8's? How is it?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-24-2009, 05:04 AM
flyingn's Avatar
flyingn flyingn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cinnaminson , NJ
Posts: 2,172
Thanks: 5,942
Thanked 645 Times in 258 Posts
Default Re: That's it for Chrysler?

I have a close friend with an srt 6 speed Challenger. Its nice but big and heavy.. Not much faster then my Mustang too

I found this funny

http://www.xtranormal.com/xtranormal...90318035419210

heres a good comparo of all 3..

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coup...g_gt/index.html
__________________
Frank Szymkowski

1987 Mustang GT convertible, scarlet red/titanium, white top and white/red leather, 5 speed, 3.08, factory EQ

1969 GTO Judge Warwick blue/blue, RAIII, 4 speed, tach/gauges, safe t track, flip headlights, 3.55's, ps and radio.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-24-2009, 05:36 AM
1968 nova ss 1968 nova ss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orlando,florida
Posts: 227
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: That's it for Chrysler?

your right on Rob;I couldn;t agree with your more.i guess that puts me in the dumb car guy category too.Oh well;at least i am a car guy.Chris
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-24-2009, 06:19 AM
Keith Tedford Keith Tedford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: That's it for Chrysler?

I agree with you Rob. Alex Taylor III appears to be just one more newspaper guy who parrots the lines that he hears others blathering out. It's not much wonder that so many newspapers are in financial problems. Like the auto industry, they aren't delivering what people need and want. Now, how does that shoe fit? My understanding is that Chrysler is going to go into bankruptcy protection, not bankruptcy and liquidation. Once the fat is gone, they will be hooking up with Fiat. We'll see.
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-24-2009, 04:03 PM
1970Bluel78 1970Bluel78 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 743
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: That's it for Chrysler?

[ QUOTE ]
I agree with you Rob. Alex Taylor III appears to be just one more newspaper guy who parrots the lines that he hears others blathering out. It's not much wonder that so many newspapers are in financial problems. Like the auto industry, they aren't delivering what people need and want. Now, how does that shoe fit? My understanding is that Chrysler is going to go into bankruptcy protection, not bankruptcy and liquidation. Once the fat is gone, they will be hooking up with Fiat. We'll see.

[/ QUOTE ]

I heard yesterday that Fiat is now looking to buy Opel from GM. That would probably kill the Dodge deal no ??
__________________
1970bluel78
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-24-2009, 06:24 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: That's it for Chrysler?

[ QUOTE ]
I heard yesterday that Fiat is now looking to buy Opel from GM. That would probably kill the Dodge deal no ??

[/ QUOTE ]
I doubt it...the way I heard it this morning was, that Fiat would basically be *given* a large stake in Chrysler, in exchange for like technology or plant refixturing or something [kind of fuzzy on the last part, as I was trying to get my youngest daughter & I out the door!]...the US Treasury, I believe, is taking the health care...but I think both of these scenarios are post-chapter 11 filing?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.