Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2001, 07:30 PM
luckyrico12 luckyrico12 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ingleside, IL
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default laquor vs. urathane paint

My dad has a '68 camaro. It has laquor on it now and it is in good condition no cracks or anything. There was an accident with some r/c fuel and the car and it needs a new paint job. Money not being an issue, what is the best thing to do: put urathane over the laquor or strip the laquor first? What is best for the car?


Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 11-20-2001, 12:55 AM
x44d80 x44d80 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: American Fork, Utah
Posts: 362
Thanks: 171
Thanked 84 Times in 43 Posts
Default Re: laquor vs. urathane paint

this question is difficult because paint systems are very elaborate today and expensive. if you ask 10 body shops you'll get 10 different answers. lookup www.camaro.net, they have a body and paint forum. charley's thraser camaro was done with a red ppg 2 part enamel system that burns your eyes, looks fantastic, and the guy who built it says you can repair rock chips easily. correct me if i'm wrong charley. the best thing is to strip first. this gives you a better clue to body work needed, prevents lifting of the new paint.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-20-2001, 02:27 AM
luckyrico12 luckyrico12 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ingleside, IL
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: laquor vs. urathane paint

That is exactly what is going on now. My dad has gone to about 7 guys and they have all said different things. Some have only said to paint the damaged areas, some just paint the whole car and some strip and then paint. He wants to do the whole car but doesn't know to strip it or not.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-20-2001, 12:51 PM
JoeC JoeC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: ri
Posts: 3,729
Thanks: 440
Thanked 2,417 Times in 616 Posts
Default Re: laquor vs. urathane paint

Sometimes it is best to consult the manufacturer of the paint products that you will use. They should have some type of tech support phone number or email.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-20-2001, 01:47 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: laquor vs. urathane paint

JoeC's idea is a good one, but often times you are in the same boat as when you started. We learned this the hard way on our Camaro, as dad talked to several paint companies, and even had a PPG rep take a look at the car. We followed their recommendations to a T, but the paint still went to crap in short order. After 5+ years of complaining, they finally decided to reimburse our supplies...gee, thanks .
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-22-2001, 03:56 PM
Stefano Stefano is offline
SCR Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Land of Lincoln
Posts: 9,029
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1,064 Times in 404 Posts
Default Re: laquor vs. urathane paint

How an original paint car is to be stripped is just as important. The bare metal on some older cars was coated prior to any primer application.

Soda blasting has worked best for me. It will not do a very good job on rust but it leave the metal closest to factory condition.
__________________
Click to visit the Nickey Performance Facebook-->
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.