![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a question for the group concerning GM's ( Chevy )
use of 4-bolt main blocks on SHP engines vs. 2-bolt main blocks on STD. & HP engines during the later 1960's & early 1970's. I was just looking at a thread in another category here concerning hemi blocks and noticed that these blocks use 4-bolt main caps in the 3 center positions, but only 2-bolt main caps in the front & rear cap positions. I hope my description is accurate. Then, I started thinking about the 396, 427 & 454 blocks and the use of 4-bolt mains front to back on SHP engines. It has been stated many times to me that you don't really need to be into 4-bolt main territory unless you are pushing 600+ HP. Is that accurate? If so, why did Chevy put 4-bolt mains in engines with just 375hp? Is this just a case of practical, real world knowledge that came about with the passage of time and engine life analysis vs. what the engineers of the day thought? ![]() Or, did the use of 4-bolt mains on the BBC factor in issues like overall engine design ( main bearing support strength )? ![]() Steve
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|
|