![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't like that tag, but It could be just the contrast and that the paint being stripped off. Do you have any others pics with it painted.
__________________
Steve Shauger The Supercar Registry www.yenko.net Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website: www.vintagecertification.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Story on the car that this tag is on - located in North Carolina after sitting behind a garage for 20+ years. I saw the pics of the car before and during restoration and it sure could have been a car from the east that sat for 20 years. Now the trim tag I know was blasted - I know the guys fairly well that did the restoration and they told me this is the tag that was on the car when they pulled it from that hole that it was sitting in.
To me it just looked like the X22 was upside down - this is not attached to a huge dollar or supposedly rare car other than color combination so the motives to fake it are reduced. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This one is as close as I could find to compare.
![]()
__________________
1967 Nova SS L30 1967 Chevelle L79 1969 RS Z/28 Red 1969 RS Z/28 Lemans Blue 1970 Z/28 Blue 1967 RS Convertible 1968 Camaro SS 1992 GMC Yukon 30166 miles |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will see if I can get any other pics of it - I really have no reason to suspect anything on the fake here as the car is not a significant value car.
I just thought it was really cool to see the tag with the error - unless I am wrong the X22 is for sure upside down. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't understand what you mean, X22 being up side down. The 22 is not upside down and the X is symetrical so even if it were up side down it wouldn't do any difference.
The angle of the picture with the shadows give you an optical illusion of a slightly distorsion of the X. But upside down, No! Jan |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe he is referring to both of the number 2's which have the curve section of the number 2 at the bottom instead of at the top.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I mostly agree with what Shauger said. This one picture is not good enough to make a good call. On the plus side the rivet goop looks original, and the 2's do not look upside down to me .
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jannes_z-28</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I don't understand what you mean, X22 being up side down. The 22 is not upside down and the X is symetrical so even if it were up side down it wouldn't do any difference.
The angle of the picture with the shadows give you an optical illusion of a slightly distorsion of the X. But upside down, No! Jan </div></div> agreed the 2's are "normal" maybe because there is no paint on it or the angle of the view looks correct
__________________
Jim R Scottsdale, AZ ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will attempt to get another shot of the trim tag from another angle to see if it will show better. The photo I provided I can see how it can be disputed - could just be weird shadowing making it appear upside down.
|
![]() |
|
|