![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is an "exceptable" fender/door gap? The left fender is original and the right from a doner car. Seems the only way they line up well is with at least a 1/4" gap. I have looked at a number of photos on-line and it seems the Novas have a pretty wide gap there. Any suggestions/comments? Thanks ... TAZ [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img]
__________________
You've never lived until you've almost died -- for those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ahhhhh the downs of a sub frame car. Try jacking off the passenger side rocker seam just behind the fender dog leg... of coarse protect the seam with a block of wood or rag rolled up. So basically what you are doing is take the weight off the sub frame. You will be surprised how easily the front sheet metal will line up better. The front fenders, core support, is all apart of the front support structure of the car. The sheet metal ties it all together.
Hope this helps...Jason
__________________
Looking for the next project. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Jason -- so what can I expect/shoot for as far as gap? TAZ
__________________
You've never lived until you've almost died -- for those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A 1/4" would be a good gap to have. I always try to get my door to quarter and door to fender gap as close as possible.
__________________
Looking for the next project. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jasonL78</div><div class="ubbcode-body">A 1/4" would be a good gap to have. I always try to get my door to quarter and door to fender gap as close as possible.
</div></div> I installed about 900,000 truck front fenders (...well...1.8 million if you count LH and RH...LOL): I agree a 1/4" gap is probably acceptable. The main thing I would look for is a gap that is consistent top to bottom; an "A" gap or a "V" gap usually draws attention to itself and is more objectionable. K
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible '63 Grand Prix '65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer '74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.56 @ 139 mph best |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the input -- I'll tackle em' again today ... TAZ
__________________
You've never lived until you've almost died -- for those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jasonL78</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ahhhhh the downs of a sub frame car. Try jacking off the passenger side rocker seam just behind the fender dog leg... of coarse protect the seam with a block of wood or rag rolled up. So basically what you are doing is take the weight off the sub frame. You will be surprised how easily the front sheet metal will line up better. The front fenders, core support, is all apart of the front support structure of the car. The sheet metal ties it all together.
Hope this helps...Jason </div></div> I'm not following...do you mean to actually loosen the frame mount or just put a jack under the rocker just aft of the fender?
__________________
Marlin 70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride) 69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride) 67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes just jack off the rocker Marlin right next to fender door gap. I always had a problem with fenders lining up with the door. Tight at top and a bigger gap at bottom. I was talking to a very wise man one day and he informed me how to get the front fenders to line up on a sub-frame car. Think about it with no front sheet metal on the car the only thing holding the sub-frame to the car is 4 rubber mounts. Now if your sub-frame mounting points are true you may not have to do this. But a lot of these cars where driven and beat on. So most sub-frames are bent or twisted one way or the other. So by just taking the weight off of the front of the sub-frame you will be amazed at how easily you get a good fender gap.
__________________
Looking for the next project. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"...just "jack off" the rocker..." Uh, I could say so much humorously, but I actually want to learn myself how to do these alignments. I am not refuting your advice Jason, because I do not have the experience with aligning, but a couple of questions would be: 1) how would jacking in that area help, if when relaxed (jack removed), would not everything return to the pre-jacked position? 2) My experience is with 1st gen. Camaros and the factory assembly process had the front sheet metal installed first, yes the cowl attaching points are strong enough to support the front sheet metal hanging without additional support, I am told. Then, the sub frame was raised under the car in assembly process. So, this being the case that the s.frame is irrelevant in the initial assembly alignment, how would the s.frame affect s.metal alignment now, in the restoration process?
My reference is as follows: <span style="font-weight: bold">Assembly Process by John Hinkley</span>, published on the <span style="font-weight: bold">CRG</span> site, "The "buck-built" front clip was lowered into place with an overhead hoist; two operators guided it into position, pulling the rear of the fenders outboard to clear the side shroud "saddlebags" on the body as the assembly moved rearward. The hook was then released and the hoist went back upstairs to pick up the next assembly. At this point, operator skill became critical as the shim packs were made up and stuffed in place for the top, front, side, and bottom fender-to-body attachments to achieve the correct gap and flush fits between the fenders and the body. Establishing a perfectly square hood opening was critical, as the hood was "trapped" on all four sides by the header, fenders, and cowl vent grille; a special "hood squaring fixture" was dropped in place. It had two pins at the rear that went into the two holes in the cowl just inboard of the fenders (the ones with the little black plastic plugs in them), two pins at the front that engaged the two holes in the top of the radiator support just inboard of the diagonal brace attachments, and locator blocks on the sides for the fenders. Once the fender fit points at the rear were properly shimmed and secured, the squaring fixture was removed, and the front end was ready for the hood. The last step prior to hood installation was to retrieve the antenna body from the R.H. hinge pillar and install it to the fender."
__________________
69 SS/RS 396 M20 X22 Nor 12B,72B,712 bought 1979 FULL OWNER HISTORY 69 Dick Harrell tribute Day II 427 M20 4.10 X11 76 orig pnt, 711 67 Super Stock 302 Camaro re-creation |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Super input -- thanks ... TAZ
__________________
You've never lived until you've almost died -- for those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know! |
![]() |
|
|