Black LS-6 Chevelle No Reserve

[Mr70]

Good looking car that Ends soon.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Chevrolet-Chevel...em=182170965420

[Zedder]

Isn't $70k cheap for this car?

[Charley Lillard]

I think the shifter on the column will hold it back a bit. Cool car though.

[COPO]

Protect-o-plate seems suspect to me. Don't like the axle code.

[BLACKLS5]

Or the transmission code...

[Mr70]

Your both right.I didn't see that protecto plate photo earlier.
Both the trans & rear are not coded correctly for an LS-6.Those 2 were specific to that engine.
His trans says L-78/LT-1.
His rear says 1971/72 3.31 Chevelle.

I emailed the seller asking him about these 2 issues.
Hopefully he'll reply.

[Fast67VelleN2O]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mr70</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
His rear says 1971/72 3.31 Chevelle.
</div></div>

How do you get that from the rear end code? If it was 1971, 1972, it would be CCF. All rear codes had the C before them starting in the late 1969 model year.

[Mr70]

Just CF was used in 1964-65-66-67-68-69 Chevelle.
CCF was new for 1970,and CCF was a 1970 L-34 coded Chevelle/Elco &amp; used in Monte too.
1971-72 Chevelle went back to CF.

[Fast67VelleN2O]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Mr70</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Just CF was used in 1964-65-66-67-68-69 Chevelle.
CCF was new for 1970,and CCF was a 1970 L-34 coded Chevelle/Elco &amp; used in Monte too.
1971-72 Chevelle went back to CF.

</div></div>

Sorry, I wrote that wrong, if 1971, 1972, it would have the C following the code, such as CFC or KDC, RUC, etc.

[Mr70]

And that second following C in your example Matt actually stood for the assembly plant code,(Buffalo),where as the 1970 CCF did not,(stood for Chevrolet),and had it's assembly plant code stamped further down.