Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-26-2007, 12:59 AM
SS427's Avatar
SS427 SS427 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pleasant Plains, IL
Posts: 10,295
Thanks: 2,992
Thanked 4,391 Times in 1,113 Posts
Default GM cubic inch limitations

I am in desperate need of some facts if anyone could help and printed ones would be even better.

The question was asked of me regarding the reasons behind Chevrolet not installing the 454 in Camaros and Novas from 1970 on. My understanding has always been that GM limited the cubic inch vs weight in the Camaros and Novas due to insurance issues and possibly sales infringements into the Chevelles and Impalas. Can anyone help with printed material or at least honest quotes from GM? I appreciate your help in advance.
Rick
__________________
Rick Nelson
Musclecar Restoration and Design, Inc (retired)
www.musclecarrestorationanddesign.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62r-6vgk2_8
specialized in (only real) LS6 Chevelle restorations
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 09-26-2007, 01:18 AM
king_midas king_midas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: California
Posts: 153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: GM cubic inch limitations

I've heard it was because of a couple of reasons, some mechanical, and some reputational.

Mechanically, because of the use of the corp. 10-bolt axle as a perceived weak-link.

Reputationally, because performance was increasingly becoming an albatross around the neck, and the mfgr's knew the writing was on the wall regarding big engines, fuel, mpg, etc... In other words, there was no good reason to continue the engineering and federalizing of those engines into those cars, so they didn't do it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2007, 01:38 AM
ORIGLS6 ORIGLS6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fishin' in the Dark
Posts: 7,410
Thanks: 1,102
Thanked 507 Times in 144 Posts
Default Re: GM cubic inch limitations

The 12 bolt rear axle had been in place in both product lines for years.
__________________
Don't mistake education for intelligence. I worked with educated people. I socialize with intelligent people.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-26-2007, 02:36 AM
Late BrakeU2 Late BrakeU2 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Malibu CA.
Posts: 1,118
Thanks: 9
Thanked 103 Times in 53 Posts
Default Re: GM cubic inch limitations

I know prior to 1970 GM had a restriction stating no mid size car engine could have a displacement larger than 400 c.i.(hello COPO)but that was dropped the following year.A marketing standpoint and insurance are the only plausible reasons-Camaros and Novas were entry level where as the Impala,Chevelle,Monte,(Firebird,GTO,Buicks) targeted the "older" buying influence who were much less affected by insurance due to age.On a side note I think that's why so many more of the latter have more docs-the people that bought them were generally older and knew the importance of keeping records jmo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-26-2007, 06:03 AM
Keith Tedford Keith Tedford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: GM cubic inch limitations

GM had plans for the 454 in the Camaro. The parts books were printed up for it. Insurance was one of the big reasons I would think. No insurance. No car. Pretty basic. People who could afford a Corvette could also afford the 454 and the insurance. If people wanted a 454 and couldn't get it in a Camaro, they would buy a Chevelle. I believe the Chevelle was cheaper to insure back then as well. GM would already know that this was the last year for the hipo cars so that may have had something to do with the call as well.
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.