Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Pit Area - Racing


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-19-2002, 10:17 AM
NEW NEW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NORWAY
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

I have a 69 Z, it has now a completely rebuilt engine,
0.3 overbore,with standard GM pistons standard Camshaft
and the standard 2.02, 1,60 Heads, The engine has been slightly top decked.

I have for now the oiginal intake, but has also been running it with my Crossram.

Anyway now the qusetion::::

Has anyone here tried swithcing from stock exhaust manifoilds, and chambered exhaust to something like Hooker headers and a little bigger exhaust system like 2,3/4" or 3".???
What is your experiences, there is no punch in the engine and i am thinking it could be the manifoilds that is to restrictive?

And does anyone know what jet sizes is best to run in the stock Z carb, aaaaaaaaand some more, does anybody have recomandations regarding crossram intake, and jetting, maybe it also would be better switching for 1.st design camshaft...

Any tips, or info from people that has tried diffrent things, or people in the know of something pls. Reply..


In advance, THANKS

NEWs,,,
and i know it is not like a Super Super car but it is a super car
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 12-19-2002, 10:34 AM
COPO PETE COPO PETE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Glencoe, Ont. Canada.
Posts: 1,382
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

I don't believe you will see that much of a gain with headers, but there will be some, nothing really seat of the pants. Sounds like it is geared wrong. What tranny you got???? If it's a M21, you'll need at least 4:88 gears. If it's a M20 4:11 minimum to 4:56. Maybe Mark will chime in on the crossram jetting???
Peter
__________________
Pete Simpson 1962-2013 RIP
Owen Simpson
Eric Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-19-2002, 01:44 PM
Keith Tedford Keith Tedford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

Back in '69 Nurse Chev-Olds installed a track cam and cross ram setup on a Z/28. With the stock 3:73 gears there was absolutely nothing below 4000 rpm. 4:56 gears would be the minimum for this combination on the street. The M21 might have been the ticket on the road courses but it didn't do the street car any favours. Tony Pizzi showed what terrors these cars could be on the strip when set up properly. On the stock 780 Holley with power valves front and back #73 primary and #76 secondary jets would be a good start.
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-19-2002, 05:14 PM
NEW NEW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NORWAY
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered


Me Again!

I am running M21, and 4,10 in the rear.

Its the 780 carb, but i∆m running 78 on the primary, and 80 on the secondary now.

What timing would be suggested? i∆ve read abt. people doing sometimes like 42 total.

I once had a L88 with stock manifoilds, and stock type exhaust, once i put headers and some less restrictive system on that engine it was like a diffrent engine.

It also have a tendency to get sligthly hot on the exhaust side, LH side.

Has anyone had any problems with the smog system leaking in, and making the engine backfire?,

NEW

thanks for the replys [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-19-2002, 09:26 PM
COPO PETE COPO PETE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Glencoe, Ont. Canada.
Posts: 1,382
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

Stick some 72's or 73's in the front, give it 42 degrees timing, put some 4:88 in it and call me in the morning [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smirk.gif[/img] L88 with headers will pick you up over 50 horse over manifolds, you will not see anywhere near that on a 302. Do run something like an ultraflow muffler on it.
Peter
__________________
Pete Simpson 1962-2013 RIP
Owen Simpson
Eric Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-19-2002, 09:30 PM
JoeC JoeC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: ri
Posts: 3,721
Thanks: 429
Thanked 2,381 Times in 608 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

Also try the lightest springs you can find in the carb and dist.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-20-2002, 10:36 PM
Salvatore Salvatore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,908
Thanks: 3
Thanked 229 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

Tony Pizzi was great! That car flew. 11:68 with 7in. tires. NHRA kept factoring him to death, like they did to Bernie Agaman's 71 454 corvette. The both got out of stock and super stock racing because of that. Jenkins gets some credit for Pizzi running so well also.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-21-2002, 03:28 AM
NEW NEW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NORWAY
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

Hi again,,

if you guys would like you could i think, if i do it right,
see the car here: www.newsgarage.com/inventory.html


NEWs
and again thanks [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
And you know what, here in Norway we get 98 octane at the pump, so some additives easily gets us up to 102-104 octane
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-20-2002, 10:27 PM
Salvatore Salvatore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,908
Thanks: 3
Thanked 229 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: 69 Z, Headers, VS Stock Manifold and Chambered

Hi new member. Mostly all the things these guys have been telling you I think are right. The chambered exhaust is restrictive. A set of headers is a must for the little 302. Take the smog off and put it into the closet, for now. Put a good set of 2.5in. pipes on it with the cross flow pipe and low restrictor mufflers of your choice. You really do need the M20 with 4:10's or even 4:56's with a taller tire. These 302's have NO torque. I like running the timing around 40 to 42 total advance with the advancement coming in around 2500 rpm's. Jack Podell has a gas additive for 93 octane. You can get as much as 103 octane with the mixture. It is a REAL lead additive. 72 jets in front with 76's in the back sounds good. I don't run the power valve in the front because they are annoying. My car has no problem surging or pulling out. If you set the 30-30 cam a little tighter like 28-28 you can see that it does gain a little more torque with a tighter valve lash. 28in. tires in the back with a 4:10 and a 254 first gear will make your car very drivable and perform well. If you can't find the correct spring tension for your 780 holley you can always install a small nut and bolt in the carb linkage to enhance your secondaries to open quicker without the aid of vacuum. Make sure that your motor does have the correct compression ratio. At least a true 10:50 to 11:1. The smaller the motor the more this helps. Make sure your valve springs are good and REV it to death! Jack Podell is in Hemmings Motor News. Have fun! Sam
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.