Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-06-2003, 07:09 PM
copo9566aa copo9566aa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Montréal, Québec ,Canada Je me souviens
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default COPO vs M & O Mopar

Copo cars it's very similar to M-code Mopar
1969 M-code mopar Barracuda-Dart-Road 6Bbl-R/T Six-Pak
It's more (Civilian)(Streetable)than the O code Mopar
The M-code for Mopar =Spªcial engine
The O-code for Mopar =Super Stock
The O-code car it's not realy streetable.
What's is your opinion about this.
COPO car is comparable to M-code or O-code Mopar.

Reply With Quote
Attachments - The Supercar Registry 29330-Mvc-183s.jpg 29327-Mvc-180s.jpg
O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 01-06-2003, 08:10 PM
JoeC JoeC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: ri
Posts: 3,729
Thanks: 442
Thanked 2,417 Times in 616 Posts
Default Re: COPO vs M & O Mopar

Is the "O" car the Hemi cars?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-06-2003, 08:22 PM
copo9566aa copo9566aa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Montréal, Québec ,Canada Je me souviens
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: COPO vs M & O Mopar

Yes the O cars is the Hemi Super Super Stock
Belvedere RO23 Coronet WO23 Barracuda B0 Dart LO
The second letter of the VIN O is for Super Stock.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-06-2003, 08:34 PM
sixtiesmuscle sixtiesmuscle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago suburb
Posts: 1,093
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: COPO vs M & O Mopar

With the low number of M code Cudas & Darts produced in 69 they should be the Copos of Mopars IMO, BUT, they just don't hold the mystique. The "O code" hemi cars are in a different category altogether. There is no direct comp to the Copos.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-06-2003, 09:00 PM
copo9566aa copo9566aa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Montréal, Québec ,Canada Je me souviens
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: COPO vs M & O Mopar

I agree
But Bigger production of M-code in B/Body
Typical match ZL1 VS M- Road and Yenko Camaro VS M- Bee SixPak
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-06-2003, 10:16 PM
copo9566aa copo9566aa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Montréal, Québec ,Canada Je me souviens
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: COPO vs M & O Mopar

Estimated production for M-Code Mopar in 69
358* Cuda
640* Dart GTS
1,907* Bee
1,432* Road
and similar to COPO no ragtop M-code.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-06-2003, 11:27 PM
sixtiesmuscle sixtiesmuscle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago suburb
Posts: 1,093
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: COPO vs M & O Mopar

I don't know where you got those figures, but, the Cudas & Darts were nowhere near that high from my sources. Maybe some Mopar experts can chime in?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2003, 01:36 AM
Rat_Pack Rat_Pack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Maryville TN
Posts: 672
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: COPO vs M & O Mopar

sixtiesmuscle, the counts look correct except the Cuda, I show 340 M code automatic Cudas shipped. Galen could have come up with another 18 cars since I last researched this. Same goes for the Dart GTS, 640 shipped and all were automatics. Option code A13 Engine Conversion Pkg 440 1- 4bbl. [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/cool.gif[/img] ............RatPack...............
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.