![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here are some larger pics (I hope)
My latest concern is the rear axle???? Why would you take out a 12 bolt that came with the car to install this coded axle. (unless you destroyed it racing???) ANY IDEAS? [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img] Dicky [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/flag.gif[/img]
__________________
Dicky |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone else think that stamp looks funky? Help the guy out. I know there are some experts here that can tell right away if it's a bad stamp or not.
__________________
Tony 55 Nomad Gasser 70 SS 427 Nova 34 Ford Sedan..Hemi powered Michigan/ Florida |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like a factory double strike to me.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kurt S</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I see possible issues with that stamp, but I can't tell with that picture quality.... </div></div>
The front characters used match the front gang loading used in Flint in March of '70 to a tee. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Im not liking that engine stamping. A better close up of that is needed.
Doesn't look right from what I see.
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise 1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise 1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed 1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion 1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 70 copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kurt S</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I see possible issues with that stamp, but I can't tell with that picture quality.... </div></div>
The front characters used match the front gang loading used in Flint in March of '70 to a tee. </div></div> I do not like it either. But I think it is also likely original. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm surprised noone has commented on the trans VIN.
Jason |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 70 copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 70 copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kurt S</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I see possible issues with that stamp, but I can't tell with that picture quality.... </div></div>
The front characters used match the front gang loading used in Flint in March of '70 to a tee. </div></div> I do not like it either. But I think it is also likely original. </div></div> Kinda hard to make an evaluation on a stamp you can't see clearly.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
![]() |
|
|