Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-12-2013, 03:21 PM
COPO COPO is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Atlanta, GA & the Middle East
Posts: 3,022
Thanks: 400
Thanked 377 Times in 201 Posts
Default Re: M22 Date Code VS. TT Car Date....HELP

Here's the link to the advertisement

http://www.racingjunk.com/Camaro/1820568...wSuperSize=true
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-12-2013, 06:07 PM
Dicky's Avatar
Dicky Dicky is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: KCYS
Posts: 704
Thanks: 61
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: M22 Date Code VS. TT Car Date....HELP

Here are some larger pics (I hope)

My latest concern is the rear axle???? Why would you take out a 12 bolt
that came with the car to install this coded axle. (unless you destroyed
it racing???)

ANY IDEAS? [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img]

Dicky [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/flag.gif[/img]
Attached Images
     
__________________
Dicky

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-12-2013, 10:42 PM
TDW TDW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 1,951
Thanks: 29
Thanked 39 Times in 23 Posts
Default Re: M22 Date Code VS. TT Car Date....HELP

Anyone else think that stamp looks funky? Help the guy out. I know there are some experts here that can tell right away if it's a bad stamp or not.
__________________
Tony
55 Nomad Gasser
70 SS 427 Nova
34 Ford Sedan..Hemi powered
Michigan/ Florida
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-12-2013, 11:04 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,241 Times in 578 Posts
Default Re: M22 Date Code VS. TT Car Date....HELP

Looks like a factory double strike to me.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-13-2013, 02:57 AM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,092
Thanks: 2
Thanked 787 Times in 366 Posts
Default Re: M22 Date Code VS. TT Car Date....HELP

I see possible issues with that stamp, but I can't tell with that picture quality....
__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-13-2013, 10:46 AM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,241 Times in 578 Posts
Default Re: M22 Date Code VS. TT Car Date....HELP

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kurt S</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I see possible issues with that stamp, but I can't tell with that picture quality.... </div></div>

The front characters used match the front gang loading used in Flint in March of '70 to a tee.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-13-2013, 02:29 PM
Jonesy's Avatar
Jonesy Jonesy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 3,141
Thanks: 337
Thanked 801 Times in 499 Posts
Default Re: M22 Date Code VS. TT Car Date....HELP

Im not liking that engine stamping. A better close up of that is needed.
Doesn't look right from what I see.
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise
1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise
1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed
1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion
1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-13-2013, 02:53 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,241 Times in 578 Posts
Default Re: M22 Date Code VS. TT Car Date....HELP

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 70 copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kurt S</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I see possible issues with that stamp, but I can't tell with that picture quality.... </div></div>

The front characters used match the front gang loading used in Flint in March of '70 to a tee. </div></div>

I do not like it either. But I think it is also likely original.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-13-2013, 04:21 PM
SuperNovaSS SuperNovaSS is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 6,563
Thanks: 393
Thanked 701 Times in 365 Posts
Default Re: M22 Date Code VS. TT Car Date....HELP

I'm surprised noone has commented on the trans VIN.


Jason
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-15-2013, 02:40 AM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,092
Thanks: 2
Thanked 787 Times in 366 Posts
Default Re: M22 Date Code VS. TT Car Date....HELP

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 70 copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 70 copo</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Kurt S</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I see possible issues with that stamp, but I can't tell with that picture quality.... </div></div>

The front characters used match the front gang loading used in Flint in March of '70 to a tee. </div></div>

I do not like it either. But I think it is also likely original. </div></div>
Kinda hard to make an evaluation on a stamp you can't see clearly.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.