Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#1
05-10-2008, 12:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
67z vs 93z
I was up at the bar two nights ago and the owner bought a 93 z-28 camaro new. Anyhow after a fair amount of booze he thinks he can out run my stock 67Z-28 on a Quarter mile track. Considering I have races at Eddyville Raceway for years. I explained I would kick is A$$ in the Quarter mile. How fast are the lt-1s?
__________________
Jake is my grandson!! 
|
|
#2
05-10-2008, 01:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67z vs 93z
Tires will be a BIG factor!
__________________
Don't mistake education for intelligence. I worked with educated people. I socialize with intelligent people.
|
|
#3
05-10-2008, 01:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67z vs 93z
Give it a go,I have eaten the odd 90s car with the LT1 at the track with my 68 z all stock with bias ply. Lt 1 cars do not scare me but the LS 1 cars are crazy quike
__________________
1968 LOS Rallye Green Z28
|
|
#4
05-10-2008, 01:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67z vs 93z
My stock '97 LT1 convert (auto) runs low 14's.
__________________
|
|
#6
05-10-2008, 04:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67z vs 93z
In the October 1996 Car & Driver Jerry M ran his restored Tahoe Turquoise '67 Z/28 against a new '97 Z convert and a '97 Z28 SS LT4. 15.30/97 for the '67; 14.7/95 for the convert, 13.6/105 for the LT4.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
|
|
#7
05-10-2008, 05:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67z vs 93z
One things for sure,they would be a lot closer in the quarter than on a road course.
|
|
#8
05-10-2008, 05:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67z vs 93z
He will eat you up Kim! Especially if he can drive a little. If your 67 has a 4:56 rear and some better tires than it would be closer.
 
|
|
#9
05-10-2008, 05:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67z vs 93z
I had a couple friends in from out of town, and they wondered which was quicker in the quarter, the freshly restored bone stock (excl. 235 BFGs on the rear)'69 Z, or the bone stock '95 Z vert 6-spd sitting next to it. We took 'em out to see.
Two passes. '95 Z by at least a couple car lengths both times. JB
|
|
#10
05-10-2008, 06:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 67z vs 93z
I bought a new '93 Six Speed and ran it stock at 'da Grove.
Best I could do was 14.2s, I couldn't get it to hook and had to come out real easy. It had better et's in it. The magazine guys were in the 13's? This was a loaded car and very heavy. It did have the optional performance gear ratio. I bought an automatic the next year ('94) and it also Ran 14.20s. You just left it in gear and punched it. Loading the converter made it spin. That was hauling for a Stock Car in '93-'94. Very consistent cars, won lots of Trophies and Grudge Matches.
__________________
Click to visit the Nickey Performance Facebook--> 
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
