Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-13-2016, 01:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Is "stance" important?
[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/shocked.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
__________________
Sam...  
|
|
#3
11-15-2016, 05:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Nice. 275 60's on the rear?
__________________
1968 Camaro Ex-ISCA Show Car John 10:30
|
|
#4
12-08-2016, 04:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: markinnaples</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nice. 275 60's on the rear?</div></div>
Those are 255/60's on my 68 Mark. I think the rears are 8" rims while fronts are 7's. Previous owner had to clearance the fronts to fit over the 4 pistons brakes but I like the look of them on there. As for Grady's stance shot above...wow! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/headbang.gif[/img]
__________________
I like solid lifter cars, big cams and cars w/ 3 pedals in them. 
|
|
#5
11-15-2016, 05:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Looks good Earl!
__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkDf7PPRzJ0
|
|
#7
12-08-2016, 12:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Just had to post at least one shot of Grady's car in the "Stance thread"
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to m22mike For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#8
12-08-2016, 02:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Where's that drool button? [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/drool.gif[/img] Oh, there it is. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
__________________
1968 Camaro Ex-ISCA Show Car John 10:30
|
|
#9
12-08-2016, 03:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
That pretty much nails it Mikey!!! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/headbang.gif[/img]
__________________
Sam...
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
