![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1966 and 1967 General Motors production documents show no production of a 427 motor in either year.
Paul
__________________
[email protected] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like I won that bet, thanks guys!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can never really "win" these arguments, because there is always the guy out there that insists that the factory would build anything you wanted back in the day.
As if a production line cranking out millions of cars is going to stop and do special requests (not to mention the Engineering, supply chain logistics, etc involved with something as significant as a different engine). |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
-Dave Semper Fi! 69 Camaro SS396 L34 X66 |
The Following User Says Thank You to HawkX66 For This Useful Post: | ||
markinnaples (04-05-2018) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If Don Yenko had harnessed the COPO process a little more aggressively in 1966, yeah, I believe he could have made 427 Chevelles happen. But he didn't. Which is a shame because it would have made for a fantastic car.
__________________
I ain't nobody, dork. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
edit: I guess it really wasn't. Even still, the 69 COPOs Gibb ordered wasn't really a lot of cars it seems. Definitely not one offs though. "Instead of placing an order for Camaros using the “Regular Production Option” sheet, used by dealerships for performance and styling upgrades, a dealership began ordering Camaros using the Central Office Purchase Order (hence the name COPO), which was generally reserved for adding alterations to municipal fleets." https://www.gmpartscenter.net/blog/b...of-copo-camaro
__________________
-Dave Semper Fi! 69 Camaro SS396 L34 X66 Last edited by HawkX66; 04-05-2018 at 05:05 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I've never seen any evidence of such a program in 66-67. It would have required substantial effort and cost, and they wouldn't have authorized it just because a person wanted to buy one that way. I would imagine you would have needed solid upper management connections and a 50 car minimum before they'd even consider it. It's also worth noting that lots of stuff appeared in PR photos that never made it to production. |
The Following User Says Thank You to novadude For This Useful Post: | ||
HawkX66 (04-06-2018) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe the 66 yenko stinger corvairs were copos because of the dual reservoir master cylinder. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all the replies, I did win the argument as he said 66 and 67 Chevelles had 427s which I said they didn't from the factory. 1969 would have been the only time that happened with very few built at the factory as a COPO Chevelle.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BigD69 For This Useful Post: | ||
442w30 (04-06-2018) |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"Experts." I stopped hanging around my cars at shows because of "experts" who would talk you to death if you let them.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 427TJ For This Useful Post: | ||
ORIGLS6 (04-10-2018), PeteLeathersac (04-06-2018) |
![]() |
|
|