|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Caveat Emptor...another repro body tag?
https://www.hemmings.com/classifieds...lle-pa-2790850
124379N527965 Reported VIN is for a Camaro built at the Norwood, OH plant on or about October 22, 1968. Car has a reproduction body tag dated 03D, 4th week March 1969. VIN tag may also not be original to the car; hidden VINs may not match.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less... |
The Following User Says Thank You to William For This Useful Post: | ||
PeteLeathersac (05-14-2024) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No need for a question mark in your title. That IS a fake tag; plain and simple.
That car is a joke.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
129k! Crazy
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
An 03D tag date with a 527965 sequence VIN, don't believe, my Z had a 522676 VIN and a 10C tag date.
__________________
70 Camaro LA Z-28 03B Citrus Green LT-1 M-40 3.73's 69 Camaro X-77 Z-28 10C Cortez Silver M-21 3.73's Deluxe Project X - SOLD 69 Camaro X-77 Z-28 01B Garnet Red w/Black top, M-20 3.73 Deluxe Houndstooth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The straight headrests would be correct for an Oct 68 car without an X code, but not for a March 69 build.
__________________
69 SS 350 convertible (in peices) 69 327 convertible (driver) |
|
|