Local Yenko Nova?

[PeteLeathersac]

Another thread's fine if necessary but I think we're onto something good so why get sidetracked w/ other stuff like everyone else does and instead look specifically at the Copo 9511 topic first then compare to BE's etc?.
Lets look at all years Copo 9511 was available and include the 9511 A/F body or any other 9511 cars too but concentrate on the '69 model year process and what was included also known paperwork, stampings and Pop's etc then compare what we've learned to BE's shipped w/ 9560/9561 and the other rear options..


[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif[/img]
~ Pete

[Schonyenko2]

Either way is fine. I think this thread was started about the local &quot;maybe&quot; Yenko Nova. It kinda got off track on the rear discussion. While related, it's moved past the &quot;maybe&quot; Yenko to what, and how anything beyond 3.55 was availabe in 69 on a Nova. I guess it could be a moderator decision. Charley, you got any mods?

[PeteLeathersac]

Ok w/ the new thread!.
And what do we need for Charley's blessings for?.
[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/CharleySucks.gif[/img]

Are we looking at the Copo 9511 option necessary in '69 to get factory axle ratios beyond the 4:10 available as an RPO?.
Or are you wanting to look at everything beyond 3:55?.

[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/hmmm.gif[/img]
~ Pete

[mockingbird812]

Click here for the separate link on COPO 9511 in the COPO-United States section.

[JRSully]

Chiming in here on the COPO 9511 topic, The 69 L78 Nova I had did in fact have a perfectly date coded, appearing original BW 12 bolt (4:56) rear, unfortunately the posi unit &amp; gears were changed out to a 3 series carrier and 3:73 gears in early 1970, originals gone. The car had a coded 3 series BB 4 spd radiator in it, but did suffer some accident damage and unsure if it ever came with a curve neck rad originally. Car had a fischer body buildsheet indicating L78, 4spd and nothing else. Wayne Bushey at Nat. Nova has heard/seen of other 69 4:56 Novas.