![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guys- I brought this post back up because I've decided on a suburban but have some questions. I really like the 2500 and like the thoughts of having all the towing/hauling capabilities I'll need. I tow a 20'camper, the '67 some and the '01 some with an open/tilt trailer. Concern is around using the 2500 as an everyday vehicle. Most 2500's I've found are '98-'99's, 4x4's with vortec 454's. What would be the difference in mpg between a 2500 vs. a 5.7l 1500 (prefer 2wd), What would I give up towing wise between a 1500? 2500 2WD's are harder to find, 1500 2wd's can be found easy. Thanks for your help.
__________________
'01 Berger SS Phase 2X6R 525 hp '67 RS/SS 350 |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In my biased opinion, the 2500 (3/4 ton model) Suburban is the way to go based on your list of towing uses (camper, cars).
The advantages over the 1500 (1/2 ton) models include: larger brakes, heavier frame, stronger transmission, stronger rear differential, and the availability of the big block 454 (in the '99 and earlier models). The margin of safety with the stronger parts and additional towing capacity of the 2500 make it a hands-down choice. I realize you are in Georgia and 4WD isn't a priority, but I'd recommend getting it. Aside from the obvious reason of 2WD 2500's are even harder to find than a 4WD 2500, think of the future...... maybe you'll want to tow a boat with that truck and having 4WD on a boat ramp to assist in pulling you out when your rear wheels are on a slippery slope could be an asset! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Regarding fuel mileage, a 2500 with the 350 (5.7L) isn't going to give you an advantage over the 454 (7.4L). The truck is heavier and the 350 will have to work harder than the 454 to move it along. The reduced efficiency of the 350 means that a mileage advantage most likely won't be there or will be marginal at best. The additional torque of the 454 is well worth sacrificing a mile-per-gallon. For a Suburban that you do plan on working by towing campers and cars, I wouldn't consider a 1500 in any form. It's like anything else..... it's best to get the right tool for the job the first time.... then you won't second guess yourself or have regrets. My biased opinion is based on being the proud owner of a '99 GMC Suburban K2500 (454, 4WD, loaded). I've had two previous Suburbans prior to that, and all were 3/4-ton models. Good luck with your search! If you have any specific questions, feel free to email me. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif[/img]
__________________
Allen 1970 Nova SS L34 396/350hp, 4-speed, 3.31 gears 1969 Corvette 350/300, 4-speed, 3.36 gears |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Allen-Thanks! Great feedback. I had the same thoughts, seems like the 350 would be harder on the transmission too, shifting more, etc. Thanks again.
__________________
'01 Berger SS Phase 2X6R 525 hp '67 RS/SS 350 |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a 2 wheel drive 2500 454 95 Suburban that is 8600 GVW with 68000 miles on it. I pull a camper and enclosed trailer with it. It does a great job but it only gets about 8 or 9 mpg running around but man does it work out on the road!I new I liked you a Nova and a 2500 Burb. Hope your feeling better. Mark
|
![]() |
|
|