Is "stance" important?

[ss427copo]

I like!

[ss427copo]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: markinnaples</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That Camaro is beautiful, but with those size rear tires, that thing needs to sit up about 2&quot; more in the rear. Really looks like it would hit the rear tires on the smallest bump. </div></div>
I concur. Gotta be inside the wheel well. My .02cents

[fiveforty]

[rat tuned]

[img]https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/pics...1_1320318463_7[/img]

[markinnaples]

rat tuned, that Chevelle is killing it.

[fiveforty]

[KevinW]

Not sure how I missed this thread! Great pictures! Here is the stance I worked hard for. Quite low, but using stock 6320s and re-arched factory monos.

[KLars1]

My Dad's:

Circa 1968 -- Day 2 Stance

1967 Nove SS 327/275 4 spd 4.56 running on AR Ansen Sprint Wheels w/ slicks

Help me find my Dad's custom cars! Visit: http://www.bydennislarsson.com

[ss427copo]

I know, I know....it's not &quot;classic old muscle&quot; like the first pic I posted of my '69 in this thread I started 570,000 views ago, BUT......today is today and &quot;stance still matters&quot;. With the current Mopar and Mustangs prowling the streets, my new ZL1, IMO, just has that &quot;badass stance&quot;. Merry Christmas to all you guyz!

[Xplantdad]

Yes it does...!