Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#81
05-20-2005, 05:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Clarification on Dick Harrell 69 Camaro's
A little late BUT.......Here is the suspect Vega in the summer of 71 with the K-H Strippers.
 Steve 
|
|
#85
05-20-2005, 07:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarification on Dick Harrell 69 Camaro's
some forget so soon........ Here is a thread on the Harrell Vega in question from awhile back.. I posted all the photos I had of it there. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/show.../page/0#119258 Definitely a DH Vega.
__________________
https://t.me/pump_upp
|
|
#86
05-20-2005, 07:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarification on Dick Harrell 69 Camaro's
[ QUOTE ]
Is that a "period" at the end of HARRELL, or some feeble attempt at the "trademark" logo? Nobody trying to clone the Dick Harrell crest would be silly enough to put a "period" at the end...would they???  nuch...I doubt anyone here would be interested in supplying you, or anyone else, a REAL DH crest/badge for your 3D laser copy effort. The DH crest/badge is a propriatary product, to my understanding, and trademark infringement is serious business.  SS [/ QUOTE ] The Ebay auction for this incorrect repop emblem seems to actually be the Harrell family selling them??? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=7974399171 Look close at the fonts on the original to repop.. the "A" and "R" are clearly way off. I guess the repop is good enough for a clone though..
__________________
https://t.me/pump_upp
|
|
#87
05-20-2005, 07:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarification on Dick Harrell 69 Camaro's
You guys must be wrong. Don't trust your eyes. You weren't even there.."back in the day"...
|
|
#88
05-20-2005, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarification on Dick Harrell 69 Camaro's
Steve,
The "period" is actually a "registered" mark ( R in circle ) but it is tough to see. Steve
__________________
|
|
#89
05-20-2005, 04:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarification on Dick Harrell 69 Camaro's
Steve,
To your response about the "proprietary" nature of the original emblems, I don't disagree. However, I want to make it clear that I have no intention of marketing any such item even if I did recreat it. I merely want an exact emblem for my collection. When I got the emblem off ebay, and learned that it came from the Harrell family itself, I expected it to be correct. I was, and am somewhat disappointed in the "incorrectness" of the emblem. My many thanks to you guys for helping me realize this.  Steve
__________________
|
|
#90
05-20-2005, 05:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarification on Dick Harrell 69 Camaro's
No worries, Steve, I wasn't trying to be the DH emblem cop...I just know that, according to public filings, DH and Gibb copyrights/trademarks are an issue of some sensitive debate presently. One thing I am sure of though...there is only one Jesus.
 SS
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
