![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My opinion has always been, and take it for just what it is, an opinion, is that as long as the firewall and the main 'birdcage' if you will is reused, I do not consider it a rebody. I have had cars in my shop that we had to replace every bit of sheetmetal such as quarters, decklid, door skins, hood and fenders but used the original birdcage and firewall, I do not consider that a rebody by any stretch. Again, just my opinion.
__________________
Rick Nelson Musclecar Restoration and Design, Inc (retired) www.musclecarrestorationanddesign.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62r-6vgk2_8 specialized in (only real) LS6 Chevelle restorations |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
SOLD 1969 427 COPO Camaro Lemans Blue/Black, M22 4 speed, 15,800 original miles |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to R68GTO For This Useful Post: | ||
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agree with Rick.
But when it comes time to shop for a car, I would much rather get one that is all original panels. Similar debate on "restored" vs "over restored" or "incorrectly restored". Lots of opinions. I did some things on my car to improve on what the factory did. The bottom inch of parts of the lower rear valance on mine got no top coat from the factory. Should I have left it that way? I didn't.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’m sure it looked better reassembled than the pictures from BJ. I’m no judge, but that thing is a mess.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I guess my question, or maybe it's an opinion is,.....if a "rare" car, (take that term as you will) meaning not some base 6 cylinder daily driver, is on it's way to getting restored, aka replacing 75% of it's sheet metal, because of rot from sitting in four feet of chicken poop in a barn some where,...and it has extensive damage to the hinge pillar, cowl panel, and firewall, from a side T-Bone hit, and those panels are also showing signs of rust as well....isn't panel replacement not only the correct way to repair those area, but the proper and safe way of restoring the car? If the answer is yes, then there are only two ways to achieve that. 1. After all the work on the frame machine, the pulling and measuring is done, the cowl and firewall and dash panel are cut off and replaced, (which will be joined by rotted floors, roof, rockers, quarters, etc...being replaced later) with new NOS or Aftermarket parts, resulting in the unavoidable removal of the VIN plate, data tag, and partial VINs. Or 2. The rare car receives a donor body, one in great original shape, with all factory assembled OEM sheet metal, at factory specs, which also will result in the unavoidable removal of the VIN plate, data tag, and partial VINs. |
The Following User Says Thank You to FTC For This Useful Post: | ||
L78M22Rag (01-11-2025) |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Joe 1969 Camaro |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So a rare, numbers match, one owner, all original drivetrain, COPO Camaro, with every piece of documentation it could possibly have, that has a rotted dash panel that needs replacing,.....(and obviously needs the VIN tag removed then re-installed because of the panel replacement).... isn't a numbers matching COPO Camaro anymore because of some rust repair?
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|