|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I'm not real familiar with 1969 Z28 stamps, but I'm pretty well versed in stamps in general. My data shows that they had gangs set up for each engine option for the day they stamped. You can't compare a 1967 June 3 built IL stamp to a 1967 June 3 JE stamp.
That being said, both V0107DZ stamps should be similar or identical. I wouldn't think they had two stamps set up. I've seen some exceptions where they stamp the date only and return later to stamp the assembly letters, but you can tell as the letters are uneven. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TimG For This Useful Post: | ||
napa68 (06-08-2021), olredalert (06-08-2021) |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I had an original stamping in my database dated 6/5/12 (same as the second stamping napa68 posted) and took a quick glance. I noticed the 0 were narrow on the stamping in question, but thought perhaps it was the picture angle and decking. Good catch!
__________________
Steve Shauger The Supercar Registry www.yenko.net Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website: www.vintagecertification.com |
The Following User Says Thank You to Steve Shauger For This Useful Post: | ||
napa68 (06-08-2021) |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Kurt beat me to it, yes thats a restamp.
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise 1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise 1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed 1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion 1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner |
The Following User Says Thank You to Jonesy For This Useful Post: | ||
napa68 (06-08-2021) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|