|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
That SUPERCAR ad was actually "photoshopped" back then.I have the original somewhere showing it was a regular dirt road and they later edited the ditch in the center.
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Lee Stewart For This Useful Post: | ||
camarojoe (06-28-2017) |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Then I must have a shortened photo of it,because there is no break in the road.
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
Goodness Gracious! What is wrong with modern car advertising!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I just love these shots - thanks for posting!!!!
__________________
Sam... |
#55
|
||||
|
||||
Cool thread - thanks for sharing
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RPOLS3 For This Useful Post: | ||
Lee Stewart (06-26-2017) |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Why did they not advertise the L-78s for the 70 chevelles and elcaminos?
|
#57
|
||||
|
||||
Because they were only produced for roughly the first 90 days of assembly,before being discontinued for the new LS-6 in November/December 1969.
If they did publically advertise the L-78 as heavily as others,by the time the materials hit the news stands,the cars would've been defunct already. There are small mentions of the 1970 L-78 chevelle in certain early salesmens publications,but that was brief. Last edited by Mr70; 06-26-2017 at 08:38 PM. |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
Lee - thanks for posting; a couple comments:
a) When I was the engineering rep on the program team for my various GM Truck projects, one of my jobs was to review the advertising literature to make sure there were no mistakes in it. I looked at option content (and mix), specifications (dimensional and powertrain), photos, etc. It wasn't easy, as it takes a person with a head for the product but even then there is a tremendous amount of detail and, if you let your guard down, mistakes can slip out. Quote:
The car was perhaps provided with the condition that no open hood shots be taken, which ultimately accidentally or intentionally got ignored. K A more recent example: I took a qty of twenty 2011 Chevy Volts and converted them (in appearance) to 2012 Opel Amperas, for use in the Geneva Auto show and other GM Europe marketing exercises.
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible '63 Grand Prix '65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer '74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph best Last edited by Keith Seymore; 06-27-2017 at 07:08 PM. |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
I thought perhaps this was the same young lady (and swim suit) but now that I see them in the same spot they are not as similar as I remembered -
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible '63 Grand Prix '65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer '74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph best |
The Following User Says Thank You to Keith Seymore For This Useful Post: | ||
mockingbird812 (06-27-2017) |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
This one was taken at the GM Proving Ground in Milford, Michigan. Taken from Barnes Circle, looking south with the building area in the upper left (16% test hill in the background). The building area is the highest point in both Oakland and Livingston counties, which is why this patch of ground was chosen for the proving ground originally.
I don't know why that is so important for me to know (and share) but I do enjoy seeing if I can tell where these photos were taken. K
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible '63 Grand Prix '65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer '74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph best |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Keith Seymore For This Useful Post: | ||
Lee Stewart (06-27-2017), mockingbird812 (06-27-2017) |
|
|