|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
03-05-2021, 10:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I've been working on the 64 a little bit, not much as I've been working on a couple of other cars I have in my shop (67 L79 Corvette and a 68 Z28).
I spoke to the engine builder today. He dyno'd the motor with a carb and intake (Victor Jr. and a 750 Holley) 407hp @5500 and still climbing. His dyno historically is rather stingy. I'll be curious to see most importantly what the torque curve is. He made a point which I agree with, no sense spinning the daylights out of it and tuning anything until the F.I. unit and appropriate distributor (along with manifolds and exhaust) are on it. In order to manage time and a schedule, I am not going to spend the dyno time with the F.I. unit. My plan was to install an LT-1 cam in this as I have previously. Well.........no one is really making the LT-1 cams anymore aside from Howard's (which was at least a 5 week lead time). Yeah, you can find NOS cams around.........for about 500 bucks give or take. So, we found a cam that is very similar. Perhaps a bit more advantageous given where the valve timing is. A friend of mine is picking everything up for me week after next and is bringing it up to me (as the engine builder is 4 hours away) The fuel injection unit should be done soon. Once it is, that will go on a mule car he has. He'll chassis dyno the mule and then road test it before shipping it back to me. Crash has the tranny. Once I get that back from Eric, I can start to screw it all together. I'll have to fit it in at my shop, as the work is starting to fire back up again. I have to get going on the 68 Z28 so I can get that up for sale, and the 67 Corvette has some detailing for the Bloomington Gold Benchmark judging. Tim Last edited by napa68; 03-08-2021 at 06:41 PM. 
|
|
#62
03-08-2021, 07:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hard to read, but I think this may work pretty well.
Last edited by napa68; 03-08-2021 at 07:12 PM.
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to napa68 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#63
03-08-2021, 08:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wow, AMS, really? They built a 350 for my high school car back in 1994. Nice to see them still around.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to scuncio For This Useful Post: | ||
napa68 (03-08-2021) | ||
|
#64
03-08-2021, 10:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
----Making awesome HP for a 327 fuelie, and I know there are some adjustments that have been made. Good on you, NAPA!
|
|
#65
03-20-2021, 12:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
A good friend of mine brought me the engine yesterday, so I had a chance to get into the shop early this morning to assemble a few things. Your thoughts.........should I dust some paint on the motor of just leave the turd as is???
  The car is starting to come together, just need more time.  
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to napa68 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#66
03-20-2021, 03:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
----Boy! Hard call. As much paint as is missing I think I'd have to paint, but I would understand your reluctance. I just can't leave anything alone, a possible character flaw!....Bill S
|
|
#67
03-20-2021, 04:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would leave it. Opening the hood and seeing fresh paint would be jarring, out of place. But that's just me.
__________________
I ain't nobody, dork.
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tracker1 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#69
03-21-2021, 01:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you truely mean "dust" as in very lightly and leaving it aged and dull appearing, I would cover up some of that bare steel, if for no other reason that to prevent rust.
__________________
Mitch 1970 Chevelle SS 1966 Chevelle SS 1967 Camaro ss/rs 1938 Business coupe, street rod 2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Too Many Projects For This Useful Post: | ||
russ69 (05-01-2021) | ||
|
|
|
Linear Mode
