Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-10-2020, 03:41 PM
Outdoorsmanm5 Outdoorsmanm5 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
It would confirm that 124379L507016 was configured as a Z/28. How much of it remains needs to be determined.
So indeed a real Z28. 124379N not L
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-10-2020, 05:07 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 197
Thanked 2,130 Times in 666 Posts
Default

Whoops, fixed.

Thanks.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-10-2020, 06:09 PM
frankk frankk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Prince George.B.C.
Posts: 589
Thanks: 0
Thanked 36 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Wow! Can"t be certain of anything on the window sticker under all that plastic
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-11-2020, 12:57 AM
Lynn Lynn is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 6,960
Thanks: 32
Thanked 2,546 Times in 1,170 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
Window sticker probably is. Protect-O-Plates can be perfectly duplicated so I don't give them much credence these days.
First; no doubt in my mind that William has way more information and knowledge than I do. If William things it is original, then it probably is.

But, you have to wonder why it is so "aged". If in fact, someone cared enough about the original WS to remove carefully and save it (most got removed with a razor blade scraper and were destroyed), why would they have stored it in such a way that it ended up looking like this?

Would like to hear from KurtS on the engine stamp. Hard to tell with all the paint, but I don't like it. Like William said, doubt it would have had the partial stamped down by the oil filter.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-11-2020, 01:48 AM
Jonesy's Avatar
Jonesy Jonesy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 2,998
Thanks: 272
Thanked 698 Times in 441 Posts
Default

I dont think theres any way of confirming that engine pad stamp the way it is with all that paint covering it.

It looks like V0829DZ
The rear axle tube stamping. The B looks like it used to be a P??
Attached Images
  
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise
1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise
1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed
1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion
1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-16-2020, 03:43 AM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 2
Thanked 603 Times in 298 Posts
Default

I'd have to see a better pic of the pad without paint to make a call.
WS is real. Axle probably is OK, could just be the lighting or a bad hit (PU is a 10 bolt in 69).
__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.