|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
King of the muscle cars: 1969 A12 Road Runner/Super Bee. All you had to order as far as options was a radio. Car came standard with: 440+6 Engine 4 speed or TorqueFlite ($39 extra) 4.10 Dana Posi Rear HD 11" Drum Brakes HD 15" Wheels HD 26" Radiator G70x15 Redline Polyglas Tires A hood scoop that actually worked $3800 including AM radio and destination charge |
The Following User Says Thank You to Lee Stewart For This Useful Post: | ||
combinefixer (02-03-2018) |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Can't argue much with that last post.
__________________
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I think that if you take it from the dealership to the track, the 69 1/2 A12 Mopars were the strongest that I ever ran across. The ZL-1, L-78 and LS-6 cars had bad tires, shifters, suspensions and the smog tuning held them back.
I believe that time and memories have been kind to the stage 1 Buicks as they never ran that hard when new. Go back and look at the old road tests and they will confirm my thoughts. I had friends with a new 70 stage 1 Buick and another with a 70 1/2 Z/28 and the Z/28 won in 2 straight by 2 lengths. In fairness to each, the Z/28 had 3.73 gears and a 4 spd and the Buick had 3.42s and a T-400 and both had the F-60 x 15" tires. They even went at it for top end by hitting it at a 80 mph roll and the Z/28 won that one too. The Muscle Car Review shootout article in the mid 80s between a hemi Roadrunner and a 70 Stage 1 Buick changed the thoughts on Stage 1 Buicks for a lot of people. I had the opportunity to talk to a passenger who rode to Gainesville in the Stage 1 for the shootout, and he made it very plain to me that the Buick was far from stock. The hemi cars usually never ran that good on the street either until 1970 when they went to the hydraulic cam and 60 series tires. The earlier hemi cars on the street were usually out of tune and most had poor gearing. Most of the early muscle cars usually had a poor ignition system which held them back until the plugs were changed out for fresh ones. This would make a huge difference on how the car ran, it usually depended on how fresh the tune was on the car. The other factor was the ability of the drivers. I watched a lot of cars get beat because the driver did not have the ability of the other driver in the other lane. This controversy will never end, but my money would be on the A12 Mopars because of assembly line tires, suspension, gearing, exhaust system and the overall combination flat worked on the street. I am not a Mopar fan, but I think they won the stock production title of "King of the Muscle Cars".
__________________
69 camaro X11, 56,000 miles, original HO paint 67 camaro SS/RS, Butternut yellow, bench, fold down |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
for some mopar people the A12 might be the king...maybe..but its overshadowed by the Hemi ...just an opinion, not an argument
__________________
Mark Last edited by marxjunk; 04-22-2017 at 10:39 PM. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
TIME IS KIND TO ALL THINGS WE LOVE AND ENJOY...and with age, the story gets better all the time....i dont care wh ya are
__________________
Mark |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
The comment about driver talent is important. None of these cars guaranteed a win. I can't even think of a situation where a car with stock tires and an excellent driver would be relevant in the real world. That just sounds like a magazine article or sales propaganda.
Last edited by PxTx; 04-23-2017 at 12:24 AM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
IMO - two things that were important for a muscle car: gearing and the driver. Most muscle cars came with 3.55 gears, even the high horsepower cars. You look at all the road test from the 1960s and very few had optimum gearing (3.90 - 4.11). Most were in the 3.23 - 3.55 range.
As for the driver - it mainly applied to manual shift cars. When Chrysler held their "shootout" for their new A12 they had a couple of "regular guys" and Ronnie Sox. Sox was ALWAYS a few tenths lower than the other guys. When Chrysler decided to see what a pure stock A12 could do they removed the entire air cleaner assembly and Ronnie Sox shifted without the clutch at 5200 RPM (which Chrysler engineers told Sox was the best shift point) and posted a 12.91 ET. With the ACA = 13.00 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Hands down...ZL-1.... Unless another manufacturer made a factory built racecar with all aluminum motor
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If you include the ZL1 Camaros then you have to include the 1965 A990 Race Hemi Chryslers that would beat any muscle car INCLUDING the ZL1s |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Many automotive magazines and muscle car reviews have often considered the 1970 Chevelle SS in general the all-American Muscle car. It was fast for the day, muscular looking and affordable and available to the masses. As far as the King of the muscle cars, there are a handful that would compete for that title. I grew up in So Cal where the car culture was huge. Most of us favored Camaro's, Mustang's or Chevelle's. Mopar's (especially the winged versions) were rare. I would say the all-American moniker is accurate, however, the title of King will always be up for debate. It took years before the legends were made and their subsequent prices and collectibility status have influenced that title.
__________________
Jim Last edited by SS4Real; 04-23-2017 at 12:04 AM. |
|
|