Possible Baldwin Chevelle

[iluv69s]

ad says 4.56 rear... is that a copo option in itself?

[PeteLeathersac]

Originally Posted by iluv69s

ad says 4.56 rear... is that a copo option in itself?

Still RPO for '68 but Copo 9511 necessary to get 4:56 or deeper for '69 model year cars.

~ Pete


.

[COPO]

Originally Posted by Brucebodyman

It's not a B/M car. It's a shame he won't be realistic with price.

Man you're not kidding on the price.

[Brucebodyman]

Originally Posted by COPO

Man you're not kidding on the price.

Where did you see it for sale?

[Brucebodyman]

I found it on EBay. Man I was shocked when I saw that price. ITs way more than what he told me. What he didn't show in pics were floors. They're solid but complete scale and pitted. Needs lower qtr patches. Car needs a frame off job done to it. No way is it gonna clean up and drive the way it is. It would be possible to do that but you wouldn't have a very nice car.

[Mr70]

Here----->https://www.ebay.com/itm/1968-Chevro...pbOgXk&vxp=mtr

[Brucebodyman]

Instead of being reasonable making a few bucks on it and passing it on to somebody that can do the car justice it will sit some more. What a shame.

[PeteLeathersac]

'

Please post the VIN if you have it Bruce, then we can find this thread next time it pops up and recognize it as the same car.

~ Pete

.

[Brucebodyman]

Originally Posted by PeteLeathersac

'

Please post the VIN if you have it Bruce, then we can find this thread next time it pops up and recognize it as the same car.

~ Pete

.

I didn't get the vin. I inspected car new what it was asked how much and he was so far off on price and so positive he had a motion car and there was no telling him different so I left.

[Bill Pritchard]

Originally Posted by PeteLeathersac

Still RPO for '68 but Copo 9511 necessary to get 4:56 or deeper for '69 model year cars.

~ Pete


.

I'm not sure about that, Pete.....I've seen what appeared to be credible pictures of a 69 Chevelle L78 that came from the factory with a 4.56 rear axle.