Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Lounge


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16471  
Old 08-31-2020, 01:13 PM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,488 Times in 22,778 Posts
Default

Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Lee Stewart For This Useful Post:
67 Nova Boy (09-03-2020), Carleen (09-08-2020), dykstra (09-02-2020), markinnaples (08-31-2020)
  #16472  
Old 08-31-2020, 02:18 PM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 2,500
Thanks: 2,620
Thanked 4,491 Times in 1,247 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by x77-69z28 View Post
He crossed the center line, so he would be disqualified!
Buddy
You are correct, but props to the kid for not lifting!

K
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph best
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Keith Seymore For This Useful Post:
Lee Stewart (08-31-2020)
  #16473  
Old 08-31-2020, 02:20 PM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 2,500
Thanks: 2,620
Thanked 4,491 Times in 1,247 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67since67 View Post
What could possibly go wrong here???

When I was about that age I took out the driver's side windshield of my Grandfather's '48 Chevy coupe with a baseball at a distance similar to where that green Caddy is parked.

Then, had to go in and stand tall with a confession.
This was me, sunup til sundown (or later) all summer.

I wish I had a dollar for every time I broke the street light out in front of our house.

K
__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.85 @ 136 mph best
Reply With Quote
  #16474  
Old 08-31-2020, 02:48 PM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,488 Times in 22,778 Posts
Default

Reply With Quote
  #16475  
Old 08-31-2020, 08:12 PM
mssl72's Avatar
mssl72 mssl72 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,465
Thanks: 663
Thanked 609 Times in 350 Posts
Default

Ok, that's one way to learn...
__________________
Mark
1966 L72, 4spd Caprice
1974 Z28, M40 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #16476  
Old 08-31-2020, 08:34 PM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,426
Thanks: 70
Thanked 2,523 Times in 1,149 Posts
Default

Quote:
Mr70:I read somewhere by one of the Z-16 authority's,that although similar,the Z-16 did NOT use the 1965 Chevelle Convertibles' exact boxed frame.It did resemble it though.Also the Brakes were NOT Impala 11" brakes,but similar as well.
Both were unique to the Z-16 Chevelle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee Stewart View Post
Can you provide some links for that info?

Why would Chevrolet use one-off items like a frame and brakes as opposed to using existing items like the Chevelle convertible boxed frame and the Impala 11" brakes? Production was always going to be 200 cars. All the Chevy notes:








OK,Jeff was kind enough to clear this up.Thank you Jeff.

By jeffschevelle:
The Z-16 frame has a different part number due to a different front cross member (there could be other differences but that is the only one I am sure about) They started using the Z-16 cross member in all the frames later in the year,but did not change the part numbers as a result.
So the Z-16 frame part number remains a Z-16 only item.

The rear brakes are entirely interchangeable with a 65 Impala.The rear axle housing has Impala size tubes and bearing housings and flanges on the end. The axles are Z-16 only (Chevelle length with Impala diameter).

On the front brakes everything inside the drum is interchangeable, but the spindle, backing plate and drum are Z-16 only. You can use an Impala drum with Impala wheels, but a Z-16 wheel will not fit on an Impala front drum. The front brake hoses are 1st gen Nova.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mr70 For This Useful Post:
67since67 (08-31-2020), big gear head (08-31-2020), Lee Stewart (08-31-2020), SS427 (08-31-2020)
  #16477  
Old 08-31-2020, 09:36 PM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,488 Times in 22,778 Posts
Default ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The new cross member would of course make sense as this was the first time a big block was installed in a Chevelle.

The rear is a shortened Impala.

spindle, backing plate and drum are Z-16 only. I wonder why this was. Impala standard wheels were 14 x 5 with wagons getting 14 x 6. You could order the 6" wheels under RPO P12 with mandated 8.25x14 tires.
Reply With Quote
  #16478  
Old 08-31-2020, 10:17 PM
big gear head's Avatar
big gear head big gear head is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: KY
Posts: 3,101
Thanks: 4,764
Thanked 1,120 Times in 639 Posts
Default

Because the Impala had a 5 on 5 bolt pattern?

The Chevelle has a different rear suspension from the Impala, so it would have been a Chevelle rear end with Impala tubes, or the frame would have been modified for the Impala suspension. I would bet that it just had Impala tubes.
__________________
Freddie
1969 Camaro RS/SS396 (427) 4 speed

Last edited by big gear head; 08-31-2020 at 10:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16479  
Old 08-31-2020, 11:12 PM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,488 Times in 22,778 Posts
Default



When the bones of the early armored dinosaur Scelidosaurus were unearthed in 1858 in west Dorset, England, they comprised the first complete dinosaur skeleton ever identified. Scelidosaurus, which lived about 193 million years ago, was an early member of the evolutionary lineage that led to the dinosaur group called ankylosaurs. Ankylosaurs were so heavily armored - some even wielding a bony club at the end of their tails - that they are dubbed the tank dinosaurs.
Reply With Quote
  #16480  
Old 08-31-2020, 11:14 PM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,488 Times in 22,778 Posts
Default



Have you seen this artifact on your HDTV? It's called Color Banding. It's a result of HD's low 8 bit color depth - the same color depth used in standard definition TV.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.