Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-09-2010, 08:23 PM
cammer427 cammer427 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 97
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default 1963 Belvedere Lightweight?

I've come across a certain 1963 Plymouth Belvedere at several local car shows. The engine is apparently a 426 Wedge (it originally had a dual 4-bbl, cross-ram intake, but now has a single 4-bbl intake. Here's a photo of the car:



The owner has mentioned that he went down to the States to drag race in Super Stock for a couple years back in the mid-late '60s, so I don't have much reason to doubt his knowledge of these types of cars. He mentioned it IS NOT a 426 Max Wedge car, but rather a '63 &quot;Lightweight&quot;. He mentioned very few were built and that the car was built by the factory (or a company Plymouth had gotten to build it). Did Plymouth build &quot;lightweight&quot; Belvedere drag racers in '63 with a 426 Wedge engine <span style="font-style: italic">which wasn't</span> the 426 Max Wedge?
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 05-09-2010, 08:44 PM
John Brown's Avatar
John Brown John Brown is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,730
Thanks: 266
Thanked 408 Times in 192 Posts
Default Re: 1963 Belvedere Lightweight?

My old NHRA class guide shows the ~Aluminum Component Car~ was available with either the 415 or 425 horsepower engine in 63, and they show weight breaks for the aluminum parts on all the body styles.
__________________
......................
John Brown

This isn't rocket surgery.....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-09-2010, 08:59 PM
old5.0's Avatar
old5.0 old5.0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 921
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: 1963 Belvedere Lightweight?

I've never heard of any such animal, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There was a high-perf inline dual four barrel 413 available very early in the 62 model year, but I believe it was canceled when the Max was released, and survivors are few and far between. I'm not aware of a similar option for 63. I think that B-Body options that year skipped right from a 383 to the Max Wedge.

It could be something that was built by an individual very early on. As an example, I've heard a story that the parts manager at Feld Chevrolet in Kansas City, KS built his own Z-11 Impala with service parts on a brand new 409-425 Impala hardtop. Even though that car was not built as a Z-11, it had all the special parts on it almost from day one. This car could be similar.
__________________
98 Cobra. Long tubes. Big cams. Shifter. 4.88s. Still slow.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2010, 09:31 PM
John Brown's Avatar
John Brown John Brown is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,730
Thanks: 266
Thanked 408 Times in 192 Posts
Default Re: 1963 Belvedere Lightweight?

http://www.nhra.com/competition/classification.aspx

Quote NHRA <span style="font-style: italic">&quot;Al(uminum) component car required to have aluminum hood with hood scoops, &amp; both aluminum front fenders to be classified as an aluminum component car.&quot;</span>

They show the flat steel hood or the aluminum hoods with scoops. Then you can add in the variations with the high compression engine with dual carbs or the low compression engine with dual carbs. Plus they have the Super Stock weight factors on the same page..... It gets just a little busy. Just take a look and see. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/crazy.gif[/img]
__________________
......................
John Brown

This isn't rocket surgery.....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-2010, 12:55 AM
old5.0's Avatar
old5.0 old5.0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 921
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: 1963 Belvedere Lightweight?

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: John Brown</div><div class="ubbcode-body">http://www.nhra.com/competition/classification.aspx

Quote NHRA <span style="font-style: italic">&quot;Al(uminum) component car required to have aluminum hood with hood scoops, &amp; both aluminum front fenders to be classified as an aluminum component car.&quot;</span>

They show the flat steel hood or the aluminum hoods with scoops. Then you can add in the variations with the high compression engine with dual carbs or the low compression engine with dual carbs. Plus they have the Super Stock weight factors on the same page..... It gets just a little busy. Just take a look and see. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/crazy.gif[/img] </div></div>

Yeah, it appears that they were all Max Wedges, either of the high or low compression variety.
__________________
98 Cobra. Long tubes. Big cams. Shifter. 4.88s. Still slow.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.