|
|
|
#1
12-27-2003, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
COPO numbers
It appears that the COPO numbers got smaller as time went on. 9737 in 68; 9560,9561,9562 in 69; 9010 in 70. There must have been a system for assigning numbers. Can anyone tell us what that system was?
|
|
#2
12-27-2003, 09:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: COPO numbers
How's this. COPO#s started at 10,000 and were assigned down. The #s we don't see or care about are taxis, dump trucks, fleet cars etc. the yenko 68 COPO# vs the Gibb COPO# would be prime example. If you don't like this one i will think-up another one. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/scholar.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/naughty.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/CharleySucks.gif[/img]
__________________
Jake is my grandson!!
|
|
#5
12-28-2003, 12:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: COPO numbers
A few years ago I bought a GM COPO book. It listed all kinds of truck stuff and skipped right past the COPO stuff that we would be interested in. Thought that I had stumbled onto a real gold mine.....Not. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now. 
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
