70 ls6 survivor

[Richls5]

This cars been forsale forever what’s the deal with it? I think I remember seeing a post about it

http://www.northwestclassicautomall....ep=4&pid=11532

[67 Nova Boy]

Link or picture may help to know what car your referring to.

Dave
67 Nova Boy

[Bill Pritchard]

Maybe people don't like the interior change on an otherwise 'survivor' type car???

[PeteLeathersac]

'

VIN 136370A152250
LS6 Registry # 0049
Click here for old sale ad w/ more pics/info including full McJerry report...
https://www.gtautolounge.com/vehicle...115c1b7a1c63bd

~ Pete

.

[Wakepowell]

My opinion is that this LS6 is a "'tweener". Between a survivor and a restored car. Coupled with the interior discrepancy it makes the car a tough sell. And most likely drives the price down.

Compared to my survivor LS6 with less than half the mileage of this one, the engine compartment looks way too nice (block paint, master cylinder paint, etc...). Same with the underside. Jerry MacNeish's report kindly indicates this.

[RSSSfan]

Interesting that they were still using Muncie shifters in 1970 cars. The Camaro switched to Hurst shifters in 69.


I see he has the notorious "brown letter" TA Radials. I think I would just give up and turn the blackwalls out.

[olredalert]

----If the price was adjusted (downward) to reflect the interior change it might be more enticing. Interior is easiest to change out, espescially white to black.....Bill S

[Oldss]

Has anybody noticed the hood stripes? They look short and narrow. Or is it just me? There are no good pics to get a real good look at them.

[Bill Pritchard]

Originally Posted by Wakepowell

My opinion is that this LS6 is a "'tweener". Between a survivor and a restored car.

I just passed up buying another 69 Chevelle that fell into the same category. It is, unfortunately, easy to screw up a 'survivor' type car.