E-Bay '69 Yenko Disguised As a Z-28 Clone! - Page 22

vfitom · #**211** 11-10-2010, 06:49 AM

Bergy, I did not search for other angles. I went from notes we had taken at the time. I tried to help you, but you got cocky and personal, even mentioning my profession in a negative manner. Shame on you! I not once mentioned yours. I hoped you would answer my questions that I asked you a short time ago. You elected not to. The seller was advised in 2000 of how to rememdy his situation, but he did not. And now you have this vehicle. Good luck, and I really mean that in a positive manner! I hope you were told the truth in all your past inquiries............. And I know zero about an envelope..........

**bergy** · #**212** 11-10-2010, 12:07 PM

Tom - It's pretty obvious to everyone that has read your comments what you are doing. I appologize if I have offended you. When I received your demand that I answer 7 questions (before you would help me) - I didn't take it well. I'm happy to post our emails if you want the record to be clear (only with your permission).

**YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY** · #**213** 11-10-2010, 02:09 PM

Junk yard = Klingers in Pine Grove??

1969z280 · #**214** 11-10-2010, 02:57 PM

Bergy:

Anonymous information from a non-paying member without a complete profile should be taken with a grain of salt. He appears to be in this for the money given his Hemmings Ad. I would simply move on with your investigation. I would have thought that a retired police officer would/should be one of the most forth-coming individuals on the planet. I guess not?

There's a lot of trolls in the forest. Ed

vfitom · #**215** 11-10-2010, 03:12 PM

Not true Ed. Not for the money via Hemmings; just for knowledge. Before I gave out info I just wanted some in return, which I never got. Thats all. I apologize to all who I may offended.

**bergy** · #**216** 11-10-2010, 03:19 PM

Tom - Your post re - "I hope you were told the truth" is interesting. You're always trying to sow seeds of doubt. I wonder why? My sources have all given me permission to reveal their names and telephone numbers (hardly the m.o. liars). You, however, are very secretive (even anonymous and non-paying). You do, however, know someone who frequents junk yards and "discovers" rare cars in them. HMMMMMMM.

**bergy** · #**217** 11-10-2010, 03:47 PM

Tom - Your Hemmings ad lists item #3 - "restoration of vin's". Have I interrupted your "discovery"? I can't be certain of this, but 2+2 does still equal 4. Were you intending to try to "restore my vin" on your "discovery"? Who could be paying you to do this? It's out in the open now - you might as well be forthcoming. A huge percentage of my car is #616414. Using inside contacts with the police to accomplish a plan like this (without disclosing the details of my car) would certainly be unethical and possibly illegal.

COPO140 · #**218** 11-10-2010, 04:30 PM

Bergy,
A huge percentage of your car is 616414? Are you serious? You have yet to prove that and have not presented anything factual to support that. If you have additional info, lay it out there. I simply can not believe where this thread has gone. I personally see nothing wrong with anything vfitom is doing. The burden of proof is on bergy. Maybe vfitom is waiting to see how bergy presents this car before he speaks. I do not know either bergy of vfitom so I have no vested interest either way. I do know that over the years there have been a lot of fakes and rebodies passed of as real so I would say that bergy has alot of footwork to do and facts to present before a statement like "a large percentage of my car is 616414". Its obvious that people want to give bergy the benefit of the doubt and he may be a nice guy but cmon, this is rediculous!If we are judging the car on facts alone at this point, it does not look good for bergy imo.

**bergy** · #**219** 11-10-2010, 05:02 PM

COPO140 - I'm just looking for the truth. Talking to old owners and getting their statements. So far it's pretty encouraging. You have posted the same thing about 9 times so far on this thread - we hear you. I'll just keep going with my investigation.

COPO140 · #**220** 11-10-2010, 05:11 PM

I just have a few questions since you want to get a little smart with me.1. Why do you make the statement "a large percentage of my car is 616414"? 2. Has the vin been off and re-attached to the car? And 3. Does the car retain any part of it's original firewall? Please dont skirt the issue when you make a statement like "a large percentage of my car is 616414, that's how cars begin to become real. What facts do you have?