Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-05-2018, 02:10 PM
SS427's Avatar
SS427 SS427 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pleasant Plains, IL
Posts: 10,145
Thanks: 2,669
Thanked 3,856 Times in 998 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markinnaples View Post
Ah, thanks Rick. That is too bad, as one would think that the 427 and the Chevelle were made for one another.
They were but corporate rules prohibited anything larger than a 400 cu in engine installed in an intermediate or smaller bodied car as from what I understand they did not want those cars to compete against the Corvette. That obviously changed somewhat with the COPO (limited production) and then again in 1970 with the LS6 and Corvette had nothing anywhere near that Chevelle.
__________________
Rick Nelson
Musclecar Restoration and Design, Inc
www.musclecarrestorationanddesign.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62r-6vgk2_8
specializing in (only real) LS6 Chevelle restorations
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-05-2018, 03:08 PM
HawkX66's Avatar
HawkX66 HawkX66 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: VA/MA
Posts: 1,021
Thanks: 1,015
Thanked 222 Times in 132 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novadude View Post
You can never really "win" these arguments, because there is always the guy out there that insists that the factory would build anything you wanted back in the day.

As if a production line cranking out millions of cars is going to stop and do special requests (not to mention the Engineering, supply chain logistics, etc involved with something as significant as a different engine).
Not to be argumentative, but isn't that what COPO essentially did?
__________________
-Dave
Semper Fi!

69 Camaro SS396 L34 X66
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HawkX66 For This Useful Post:
markinnaples (04-05-2018)
  #13  
Old 04-05-2018, 04:37 PM
Tracker1's Avatar
Tracker1 Tracker1 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ONTARIO
Posts: 3,318
Thanks: 857
Thanked 886 Times in 437 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkX66 View Post
Not to be argumentative, but isn't that what COPO essentially did?
COPO worked with significant numbers of cars/trucks - large orders with dozens or hundreds of vehicles. And/Or with a high-volume dealership that had clout because they themselves sold THOUSANDS of vehicles, e.g., Yenko or Gibb. Hardly one-offs.

If Don Yenko had harnessed the COPO process a little more aggressively in 1966, yeah, I believe he could have made 427 Chevelles happen. But he didn't.

Which is a shame because it would have made for a fantastic car.
__________________
I ain't nobody, dork.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-05-2018, 04:49 PM
HawkX66's Avatar
HawkX66 HawkX66 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: VA/MA
Posts: 1,021
Thanks: 1,015
Thanked 222 Times in 132 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tracker1 View Post
COPO worked with significant numbers of cars/trucks - large orders with dozens or hundreds of vehicles. And/Or with a high-volume dealership that had clout because they themselves sold THOUSANDS of vehicles, e.g., Yenko or Gibb. Hardly one-offs.

If Don Yenko had harnessed the COPO process a little more aggressively in 1966, yeah, I believe he could have made 427 Chevelles happen. But he didn't.

Which is a shame because it would have made for a fantastic car.
You're talking about relatively significant COPO orders, although 50 cars isn't really a lot. COPO was also for more simple requests wasn't it?

edit: I guess it really wasn't. Even still, the 69 COPOs Gibb ordered wasn't really a lot of cars it seems. Definitely not one offs though.
"Instead of placing an order for Camaros using the “Regular Production Option” sheet, used by dealerships for performance and styling upgrades, a dealership began ordering Camaros using the Central Office Purchase Order (hence the name COPO), which was generally reserved for adding alterations to municipal fleets."

https://www.gmpartscenter.net/blog/b...of-copo-camaro
__________________
-Dave
Semper Fi!

69 Camaro SS396 L34 X66

Last edited by HawkX66; 04-05-2018 at 05:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-05-2018, 05:11 PM
427TJ's Avatar
427TJ 427TJ is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PNW
Posts: 5,578
Thanks: 1,007
Thanked 289 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novadude View Post
You can never really "win" these arguments, because there is always the guy out there that insists that the factory would build anything you wanted back in the day.
"Experts." I stopped hanging around my cars at shows because of "experts" who would talk you to death if you let them.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 427TJ For This Useful Post:
ORIGLS6 (04-10-2018), PeteLeathersac (04-06-2018)
  #16  
Old 04-05-2018, 07:26 PM
Lee Stewart's Avatar
Lee Stewart Lee Stewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: ABQ, New Mexico
Posts: 36,633
Thanks: 3,506
Thanked 136,487 Times in 22,778 Posts
Default

I guess Chrysler was different from Chevrolet. They WOULD build anything, specifically Hemi cars. You just had to go to the right dealership (like Grand Spaulding Dodge) or know someone at Chrysler. You read their ordering forms that state that the Hemi was available in certain cars and not available in others. Yet there are Hemi 4 Doors (1966), Hemi Belvederes (1967), Hemi Coronet 440s (1968). They even proudly show a 1969 Hemi Charger which was not available (had to be an R/T) in one of their PR photos. ALL built by Chrysler - no dealer conversions.

Last edited by Lee Stewart; 04-05-2018 at 07:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-05-2018, 10:22 PM
novadude novadude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 739
Thanks: 3
Thanked 49 Times in 35 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkX66 View Post
Not to be argumentative, but isn't that what COPO essentially did?
Those cars were built in larger numbers, and the COPO was approved to further an agenda within Chevrolet. The COPO 427s were to support backdoor racing activities. A work-around to corporate policy. It was all about promoting brand image at a time in history when drag racing was "hot" in popular culture.

I've never seen any evidence of such a program in 66-67. It would have required substantial effort and cost, and they wouldn't have authorized it just because a person wanted to buy one that way. I would imagine you would have needed solid upper management connections and a 50 car minimum before they'd even consider it.

It's also worth noting that lots of stuff appeared in PR photos that never made it to production.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to novadude For This Useful Post:
HawkX66 (04-06-2018)
  #18  
Old 04-05-2018, 11:13 PM
61 vert 61 vert is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 326
Thanks: 3
Thanked 239 Times in 48 Posts
Default 66 copo

I believe the 66 yenko stinger corvairs were copos because of the dual reservoir master cylinder. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-06-2018, 09:10 PM
BigD69 BigD69 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 235
Thanks: 26
Thanked 24 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the replies, I did win the argument as he said 66 and 67 Chevelles had 427s which I said they didn't from the factory. 1969 would have been the only time that happened with very few built at the factory as a COPO Chevelle.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BigD69 For This Useful Post:
442w30 (04-06-2018)
  #20  
Old 04-10-2018, 02:55 PM
69hurstSC 69hurstSC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,483
Thanks: 113
Thanked 501 Times in 118 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS427 View Post
I think what Paul is saying is during the 66/67 year there are no documents that have any 427 RPO codes assigned to a Chevelle of any kind. The Tonawanda plant never assigned a code for that engine (in a Chevelle) so therefore they could not have built and installed one.
Was there an RPO code assigned to Pete Estes's Z/28 convertible?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.