Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-08-2022, 03:05 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,231 Times in 576 Posts
Default 1969 Norwood Firebird introduction.

It was brought to my attention that a couple of guys who post here believe that Camaro production was actually suspended at Norwood in the spring of 1969 for the introduction of the Firebird. This information was part of a recent discussion over at the CRG.

I would ask there but I am banned.

http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=19672.0

Fair disclosure; multiple workers and supervisors and managers were interviewed for the book Echoes of Norwood on this exact topic and all recalled a production ratio of 4 Camaros to 1 Firebird for the start of production.

Again this week I contacted multiple different Norwood personnel who were on the line that day where I again asked about the introduction of the Firebird and the same answers with consistency were again provided:

For example line worker Gale Mains went into significant detail and recalled the exact day the Firebird entered production and further expanded his recollection stating that the builds were "not at all different" on the chassis final line, "with the exception of the doghouse build on the second floor and a minor issue with lug nuts at the multi lugger on the main line". "The rest of it was built exactly the same as the Camaro". Gale specifically recalled the introduction day and confirmed a "one to four ratio on the build the day of introduction".

So the question for Kurt and William from the Norwood personnel is how are you reaching these conclusions that Camaro production was suspended because the men who ran the plant say conclusively that that never happened.

Respectfully, they are asking me to ask you how you reached these conclusions?
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 70 copo For This Useful Post:
fortim (01-08-2022), Tracker1 (01-08-2022)
Attachments - The Supercar Registry Multi Lugger.jpg IMG_7914.JPG IMG_7913.JPG IMG_7912.JPG
O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 01-08-2022, 05:24 PM
firstgenaddict's Avatar
firstgenaddict firstgenaddict is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 161
Thanked 942 Times in 457 Posts
Default

Minor issue with lug nuts...
I am interested in this...
The open face pontiac wheel RALLY II would have had an exposed lugnut, by this point in production there should not have been an open face Camaro wheel, N66 discontinued in January.

The N66 wheel used the tall crowned stainless capped lugnuts and I believe the Firebird open face used the Pontiac lug with the black cap in the end.

There were approx 13k camaros built in April, how many firebirds?
if somewhere close to 3k cars were built the remembered ratios hold up.

Obviously there were integration issues... Dave Beem's 1 owner 69 burnished brown May built L78 RS SS had a Firebird bottom rear seat cushion in it.

The big thing in my eyes is according to the NCRS data William posted is there were only 500 camaros were built between April 3 and April 14
N626098 - NCRS build date 4/3/69
N626575 - NCRS build date 4/14/69
__________________
~JAG~
NCRS#65120
68 GTO HO 4 spd Alpine Blue /Parchment 2 owner car
#21783 71 Corvette LT1 45k miles Orig paint - Brandshatch Green - National Top Flight - last known 71 LT1 built.
71 Corvette LT1 42k miles Original paint - Black - black leather - only black LT1 known to exist.
NUMEROUS Lemans blue Camaros,
Monza Red and Daytona Yellow Corvettes
& a Chevelle or two...
Survivors, restored cars, & other photos
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos

Last edited by firstgenaddict; 01-08-2022 at 05:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-08-2022, 06:02 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,468
Thanks: 194
Thanked 2,110 Times in 664 Posts
Default

I have been logging production data for decades. There are several sources.

Chevrolet ‘End of Month’ VIN reporting.

At the end of 2nd shift on the last day, a worker recorded the VIN of the last car off at the Final Line station. The info is on the CRG site. This served as the basis for my production calendar, a perpetual work in process. The info is slightly compromised by the fact that cars were not built in VIN order. While they were usually not far apart, it was possible for a body to remain in the bank for an entire shift. Remember, the last six digits of the VIN were assigned as completed bodies were received from Fisher. They were then moved to staging lanes in the body bank, based on option content.

Body and Chassis Broadcast copies [aka BBC and CBC].

Useful for Van Nuys only as Norwood did not fill the PROD. DATE box in the upper LH corner. Additionally, that portion of the sheet is often weathered away as the fuel tank copy was exposed to the elements. The Prod. Date is a day or two prior to final assembly.

Factory to Dealer invoices

Never found in a car, usually found in old dealership records. There are various dates listed; the most useful is Date Shipped. It appears to generally be 1-2 days after final assembly. Early in the ’69 model year, it was often longer.

NCRS Shipping Data Report

By far, the best source. Somewhere in here, a car with both an invoice and NCRS turned up. The NCRS date was one day prior to Date Shipped on the invoice.

Using all this information, I developed the calendar. As new information becomes available, adjustments are made as needed. Over the years, adjustments are becoming fewer and fewer. It is usually one day, bearing in mind cars were not built in VIN order.

While compiling the production calendar, I struggled in developing an April calendar that made sense. There are several Camaros final-assembled mid-April with 03E release dates so I suspected something was up. I asked John Hinckley about it. John worked for Chevrolet in Production Engineering and had occasional assignments at Norwood. It was his recollection production was delayed when Firebird tooling was transferred from Lordstown. So, I structured the calendar for no Camaro production April 4 – April 13. The rest of the April data now fit well. Over many years, I have not seen information that contradicts the existence of a production gap. I have seen NCRS data that supports it.

N626223 NCRS GM official production date 04/03/1969
N626575 NCRS GM official production date 04/14/1969

That is a gap of 353 units spanning 6 production days, at a time when Norwood was building 800+ Camaros per production day. N626223 may not have been the last Camaro built April 3rd; N626575 may not have been the first Camaro built April 14th. To get to the End of Month VIN N637106, Norwood had to produce 837 Camaros every production day through the end of the month.

Is it possible Norwood built some Camaros during that period? Sure.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...

Last edited by William; 01-08-2022 at 06:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to William For This Useful Post:
69M22Z (01-08-2022), bergy (01-09-2022)
  #4  
Old 01-08-2022, 07:03 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,231 Times in 576 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstgenaddict View Post
Minor issue with lug nuts...
I am interested in this...
The open face pontiac wheel RALLY II would have had an exposed lugnut, by this point in production there should not have been an open face Camaro wheel, N66 discontinued in January.

The N66 wheel used the tall crowned stainless capped lugnuts and I believe the Firebird open face used the Pontiac lug with the black cap in the end.

There were approx 13k camaros built in April, how many firebirds?
if somewhere close to 3k cars were built the remembered ratios hold up.

Obviously there were integration issues... Dave Beem's 1 owner 69 burnished brown May built L78 RS SS had a Firebird bottom rear seat cushion in it.

The big thing in my eyes is according to the NCRS data William posted is there were only 500 camaros were built between April 3 and April 14
N626098 - NCRS build date 4/3/69
N626575 - NCRS build date 4/14/69

The earlier version of this tool did not work properly on the first day of Firebird integrated production.

Upon discovery the line was temporality stopped and ARO's were sent to the position where the Firebirds had had the lug nuts individually installed with hand air ratchets.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 70 copo For This Useful Post:
firstgenaddict (01-08-2022)
  #5  
Old 01-08-2022, 07:17 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,231 Times in 576 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
Is it possible Norwood built some Camaros during that period? Sure.
Well we are getting someplace. You are now pivoting to a view that acknowledges what literally everybody in plant that remembers about the Firebird production integration.

Over several threads I have spent considerable time researching how the information processes that controlled plant production could fail (and why) and how those failures contributed to production data anomalies moving forward.

The data you and others collect and rely upon is generally only as good as the data produced by GM in that time period.


Just please do not run around claiming that Norwood stopped building Camaro's, that just did not happen-- until August 26th 1987 on the second shift and the last vehicle at the end of the line was a Camaro also.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-08-2022, 07:47 PM
x33rs x33rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: AZ
Posts: 759
Thanks: 43
Thanked 417 Times in 238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
The info is slightly compromised by the fact that cars were not built in VIN order. While they were usually not far apart, it was possible for a body to remain in the bank for an entire shift. Remember, the last six digits of the VIN were assigned as completed bodies were received from Fisher. They were then moved to staging lanes in the body bank, based on option content.
I've always found this interesting William. I may have talked to you about this in the past on my 69 Z with a 12D build time frame on the data plate, and how the 1st ZL1 has a 12E tag, yet the serial number is about 400 units earlier than mine. In other words, my tag is a week sooner than the 1st ZL1 but about 400 units after the ZL1 according to the serial number.
We all know the 1st ZL1 was delivered at the end of December 68 too, close to new years. I think you mentioned my car according to it's serial number probably wasn't final assembled until mid to late January.

I originally figured they were on the assembly line the same day given only 400 units apart and knowing how many per day they were doing, but not sure if that is even possible knowing final assembly of mine vs when the 1st ZL1 was finished and delivered.
Something held my Z up for quite some time. Probably not the only one I'd assume. Norwood must have had a place to store cars waiting so long for final assembly?? No telling what they were waiting for. Anyway, sorry for steering off subject, it's just interesting to me.

Last edited by x33rs; 01-08-2022 at 07:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2022, 09:07 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,231 Times in 576 Posts
Default

So lets focus a bit.. on page 125 of Echoes. There Delong Jones is quoted as having a bit more of a skeptical view of the start of Firebird production. As I see it there are two issues combining here creating confusion.

The conclusion was reached that Norwood suspended Camaro production and produced only Firebirds.

This conclusion is in error because as stated in Echoes and also the independent historical record states that the plant was physically closed for the entire week in question which I believe gave rise to the assertion that the plant shifted to Firebird only production.

Here Kurt is correct (later in the CRG thread) where he offers an opinion as to the build date start.

I will not waste anybody's time posting an excerpt from my book because that will be labeled as "my opinion".

The independent historical record however will clear things up to almost everyone's satisfaction.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2022, 09:19 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,468
Thanks: 194
Thanked 2,110 Times in 664 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70 copo View Post
Well we are getting someplace. You are now pivoting to a view that acknowledges what literally everybody in plant that remembers about the Firebird production integration.

Over several threads I have spent considerable time researching how the information processes that controlled plant production could fail (and why) and how those failures contributed to production data anomalies moving forward.

The data you and others collect and rely upon is generally only as good as the data produced by GM in that time period.


Just please do not run around claiming that Norwood stopped building Camaro's, that just did not happen-- until August 26th 1987 on the second shift and the last vehicle at the end of the line was a Camaro also.
I didn't say I was convinced it didn't happen. Known NCRS data has no Camaro production April 3-14. April 3 was a Thursday; they could easily have consumed the 353 unit gap by working all week, including Friday the 4th. The shipping data can't be that far off; Norwood had to queue finished cars away from the plant and space was tight. The cars were invoiced by GMAC the instant they left the plant. We have 200 dealer invoices for 1969 Camaros from one dealership. There is also a gap in shipping data:

N625818 shipped 4/3/69
N626468 shipped 4/14/69
N626665 shipped 4/15/69

The average build-to-ship queue 1/1/69 - 11/10/69 is 2.03 days. Not unusual to ship same day or next.

If you're dying to know, I have 15 complete VINs in the gap that are known to exist. Pick one in the middle and get NCRS for it.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-08-2022, 09:23 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,231 Times in 576 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
I didn't say I was convinced it didn't happen. Known NCRS data has no Camaro production April 3-14. April 3 was a Thursday; they could easily have consumed the 353 unit gap by working all week, including Friday the 4th. The shipping data can't be that far off; Norwood had to queue finished cars away from the plant and space was tight. The cars were invoiced by GMAC the instant they left the plant. We have 200 dealer invoices for 1969 Camaros from one dealership. There is also a gap in shipping data:

N625818 shipped 4/3/69
N626468 shipped 4/14/69
N626665 shipped 4/15/69

The average build-to-ship queue 1/1/69 - 11/10/69 is 2.03 days. Not unusual to ship same day or next.

If you're dying to know, I have 15 complete VINs in the gap that are known to exist. Pick one in the middle and get NCRS for it.
I get it. We routinely fall into the trap of overthinking things. That is a habit I had to force myself to break. The reality is that things are often simple if you factor in the human element.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2022, 09:32 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,231 Times in 576 Posts
Default

As an aside while I was digging for the Newspaper coverage I found the story that tied together the assertions from the Norwood/Lordstown "F" transition manager that Firebird was originally set for 1968 model year at Norwood.

This was the same time frame that John Hinkley was assigned for temporary engineering oversight to the construction team building the exterior parking garages.
Attached Images
  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 70 copo For This Useful Post:
firstgenaddict (01-08-2022)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.