|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#811
08-18-2016, 01:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is "stance" important?
Camaro looks great.
__________________
1968 Camaro Ex-ISCA Show Car John 10:30 
|
|
#812
08-18-2016, 01:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Yes it does I love seeing them in this stage
__________________
1969 ss 396 300 deluxe hardtop 1969 ss 396 chevelle 1978 camaro 540 ci. beater 1978 chevy shortbed stepside 1983 chevy shortbed 1985 chevy shortbed If a hammer and duct tape wont fix it u have electrical problems!
|
|
#813
08-18-2016, 01:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is "stance" important?
__________________
69 RS SS L78 conv 69 RS SS ZL1 69 L78 Chevelle conv 69 L78 Nova 69 L34 Nova 67 SS Chevelle 73 Trans Am
|
|
#814
08-18-2016, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Another nice Camaro
__________________
1968 Camaro Ex-ISCA Show Car John 10:30
|
|
#815
08-18-2016, 04:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: markinnaples</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Camaro looks great. </div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: chevyman0429</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yes it does I love seeing them in this stage </div></div> Thanks guys. That's how I've been driving it this summer. Hopefully I'll be painting it this winter. We'll see. I kind of like the primer look... [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/wink.gif[/img]
__________________
-Dave Semper Fi! 69 Camaro SS396 L34 X66
|
|
#816
08-18-2016, 04:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Just to be different, stock stance and look, but suprised a few muscle cars with this one:
 
__________________
1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire, Factory all Aluminum V8 Turbocharged and Methanol Injected TURBO ROCKET engine, 4 speed Hydramatic, 4 link rear suspension, 3.36 differential, California car, PS, PB, PW, AC, Jetfire 2 option package.
|
|
#817
08-18-2016, 05:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/shocked.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
__________________
Sam...  
|
|
#818
08-19-2016, 01:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Thanks Mr Henderson [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/smile.gif[/img]
__________________
"POTTER BROS. SUPERCARS" 72 Nova SS "My first car of 30yrs" 70 LS-6 Chevelle Double Blk 30k survivor
|
|
#819
08-25-2016, 02:58 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
You'd smoke the tires off of that Buick! SA-WEET.
__________________
Jersey Jeff 69 Day-2 L89 T400 BX 2015 ZL-1 Auto 98 Surburban
|
|
#820
08-25-2016, 04:08 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Front spring boosters are in.
__________________
My cars, passed down by my grandfather: '68 Camaro SS (454/TH400, possible L78/M22) LeMans Blue, black deluxe interior, black vinyl top. 3.73- mostly Day 2. '89 Mustang GT- 3.55, subframe connectors, muffler delete, and a couple other minor mods. Exactly as he wanted it, so how it shall stay Also: 1995 Ford F-150 XL 2004 Dodge Ram Hemi GTX- #192 of 433 Ain't no fun in viewing your car as an 'investment'. Get out there and beat on it!
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
