1967 Camaro, Norwood car, VIN 0001, info needed

[notstock71]

Trying to help out my appraiser, he is involved with a 67 Camaro, Norwood built, VIN is 0001. It is a Pro Street/ bracket car now. The Camaro is/was in Kansas. The car was titled "Bushmaster", possibly run by SKF/McQuay/Norris in the early 70's. A possible tie to a George Schreiber who used the "Bushmaster" name, did not pan out but George believes the car possibly was part of the above team.

The VIN and cowl tag are supposed to code out correctly for the car. I do not have pics available but I know Bob does. If anyone can help him out his email is [email protected] . His website is www.usaautoappraisers.com (http://www.usaautoappraisers.com)

[notstock71]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/notstock71/SNV30885.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/notstock71/SNV30652.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v384/notstock71/camarocowl.jpg

[1967Z28]

Do you have any photos of the partial VINs stamped on the cowl and firewall? Seems very odd for the #0001 serial number to show what seems to be a too late build date of 09B on the cowl tag. Also, a relatively high body number in relation to the VIN.

-Jon

[notstock71]

These are the only pics he sent me but I will see what he has.

[markjohnson]

I remember reading a long time ago that there actually several hundred 1966 Camaros out there. They were in such a hurry to get them out there competing with Mustang sales that they were released a few months early. They had 1966 titles, paperwork and everything. Anybody ever run across one of these?

[scott s]

I know my 67 l79 velle conv is 00014 build and a 08a build date i believe....And has lots of 66 stuff on it... http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

[notstock71]

More information, vintage racing pictures, and more current pictures provided courtesy of chevroletcamaros.com in link below.
http://chevroletcamaros.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=79

[JChlupsa]

1 = Chevrolet
2 = Camaro
3 = 6-cylinder engine
37 = coupe body
7 = 1967 model year
N = Norwood, OH assembly plant
100001 = vehicle serial number sequence

Decode for body number: 000860

09B = Built the Second week of September.
67-12437 = Standard Interior Coupe.
NOR = Built in Norwood Ohio.
709 = Standard Gold Bucket Seats.
Z = (A50) Strato Bucket Seats (without headrests).
G-G = Car Color is Granada Gold
G = Interior paint is Gold
Options:
5Y = (A39) Belts All Deluxe
-----------

[L34Pace]

The third to last digit on the vin tag looks a little odd? Has anyone taken the time to clean the paint off the vin plate before all the hub-ub starts?

[67L78conv]

I have a request in for clear shots of the VIN with paint removed, seam areas, certain weld areas, etc. Hopefully I will have them over the weekend.

[StealthBird]

This one sold for $110K at Barrett-Jackson this year.

http://highwinds.barrett-jackson.com/items/Fullsize/Cars/79698/79698_Rear_3-4_Web.jpg

1967 Camaro with Fisher body #001. First L.A. produced deluxe interior coupe. VIN #16, lowest known surviving VIN number. Built August 1966, scheduled assembly code of "P001", 327cid/275hp L30, RPO Z23 - special interior group, RPO Z21 - style trim group.

[Kurt S]

I was contacted when this car was originally found.
The cowl tag is out of sequence for the car. There's one other early 67 car like this.
A guess would be they didn't have cowl tags originally and they retrofitted them. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif

That other one is the lowest VIN LA car known. But there's several NOR cars that were built earlier (since NOR was the lead plant).

[jeffschevelle]

[ QUOTE ]
The third to last digit on the vin tag looks a little odd? Has anyone taken the time to clean the paint off the vin plate before all the hub-ub starts?

[/ QUOTE ]

Looks like it could be 100801 that has had the 8 hit in the middle (whether as a random dent that happened to land there, or intentionally hit with an oval punch ... ). 801 would match the cowl tag date and 860 body # a whole lot better.

Need a good pic of the vin stamp on the cowl. If it's the real thing then you would not expect it to take very long to take that one key picture and provide it to all the inquirers ...

[67L78conv]

I have received new updated pictures of the car today via the appraiser including with paint removed from VIN. The VIN exhibits no indication of tampering, nor does the pillar post it is attached to. As far s the body tag goes, that also looks as though it could very well be correct for this car even though the body number is out of range for an 09B and the date is out of range for the VIN. There is quite a bit to that though and will be commenting on that in the future.

[KStover]

My brother and I owned that car. We bought it in Utah as a stripped rust bucket and totaly restored it. We sold it at the Barret Jackson auction in Jan 07. The guy that won the auction sold it in Vegas this last October.
Keith

[ QUOTE ]
This one sold for $110K at Barrett-Jackson this year.

http://highwinds.barrett-jackson.com/items/Fullsize/Cars/79698/79698_Rear_3-4_Web.jpg

1967 Camaro with Fisher body #001. First L.A. produced deluxe interior coupe. VIN #16, lowest known surviving VIN number. Built August 1966, scheduled assembly code of "P001", 327cid/275hp L30, RPO Z23 - special interior group, RPO Z21 - style trim group.

[/ QUOTE ]

[frankyboy428]

00001 vin with 09B build date ? my 00068 vin '67 has a 08A build date. Seems odd. Frank.

[iluv69s]

I would not put too much trust in the body date versus vin...especially this early on in production...I have the only 07C 67 Z28 known that is 243 VINs from the last Norwood Camaro, but there is a 67 Z within 100 VIN's of the last Norwood Camaro that is a 07B car...???

[67L78conv]

09B is actually OK for the early "Pilot" cars that have very very low VINs. Have no idea why but there are several documented pilot cars that have low numbers but the tags are dated 09B with a body number that is far to low for an 09B. For the cars that are known the body number used here along with the date lines up very well. Regular production cars had normal dated tags and what not. Is this car a "Pilot" car? Hard to say for sure with the current information I have but does look pretty good so far.

[Kurt S]

And as I said above, I think the tag is fine too. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

[70 copo]

I am currently trying to locate the owner of the Norwood car anyone have a line on who has it? <<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif

[PeteLeathersac]

VIN 123377N100001

http://chevrolets.info/?cat=37

Here's a past owner email from 2010 who may know?
[email protected]

<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif
~ Pete

[70 copo]

Thanks Pete.. I will try the E-mail. <<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif

[70 copo]

Pete,

Car has a new owner. Anyone who knows who has it now please post or PM... Thanks! <<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif