'68 SS396 4-spd Convertible

[scuncio]

Hard to document a '68 with NOM...looks like a pretty nice car though. I can't imagine it will go much beyond $30k without docs but I've been wrong before....

http://ebay.to/2cewrHI

http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/FnkAAOSwGtRXxNK~/s-l1600.jpg

[Dave Rifkin]

Original engine or not that is a pretty car. Just need to lose those red plug wires.

[earntaz]

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Dave Rifkin</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Original engine or not that is a pretty car. Just need to lose those red plug wires.</div></div>

OR get the damn things under control ... brake lines are not part of a wire looms in my book!@#$. TAZ <<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/thumbsdown.gif

[ScottG]

To be assembly line correct , aren't the plug wires supposed to wrap twice around the brake booster too ? LOL , Yikes..

[67rs/ss]

Agree nice looking car but,states correct dated 12 bolt rear end, but 05 15 G is may 15, 4 months after car was made. The shock plates look to be after market and bell housing appears to be incorrect.

[markinnaples]

Originality aside, that is a really nice color combo '68 that I'd love to own next to my current '68.