Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-10-2003, 12:32 PM
HuggerSS396 HuggerSS396 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Thomasville PA
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Is it an SS or Original 396 Car?

I recently purchased a 69 Camaro. I only paid 3000 dollars for it. The car has SS trim with a 1972 Corvette 350 engine. It has a SS hood Power disc brakes a Th400 trans and a 12 bolt rear end. The car has a speedometer fuel gauge, column mounted tach, under dash oil batt temp gauge. Since this car does not have an X code and i could not find a broadcast sheet how can i verify that the car is an ss or even possibly a big block car.
VIN 124379N686813

ST 69 12437 NOR115132
TR 711 72B
09B

Thanks
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 06-10-2003, 01:12 PM
Jonesy's Avatar
Jonesy Jonesy is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 3,120
Thanks: 331
Thanked 784 Times in 490 Posts
Default Re: Is it an SS or Original 396 Car?

Hmmm... looks like your cowl tag was swapped out. You should have the X code. Looks like you have a Sept 68 cowl tag on your Sept 69 built car. Your VIN falls in the third week of Sept 69. Somethings fishy here.

Maybe Kurt can confirm this.

[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise
1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise
1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed
1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion
1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-12-2003, 02:17 AM
Daves69 Daves69 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it an SS or Original 396 Car?

Your cowl tag appears to be an early 69 tag(2nd week Sept 69 build date), which of course, did not use "X" codes. Check to heater core box....if the hoses exit in the middle of the box, chances are it was an original BB car, as the likelyhood of someone changing this from a small block car are pretty slim. Another clue would be to look for the dual exhaust plates welded to both the right and left side rear frame rails, SS cars would have dual exhaust. Hope this helps. DK
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-12-2003, 01:54 PM
robber6910 robber6910 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Rochelle, NY, USA
Posts: 247
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it an SS or Original 396 Car?

Just to clear things up. The VIN number and trim tag does appear to be in line. In August of '69 the body sequence numbers were reset to 100000. I have seen late '69 build trim tags that did not have an "X" code. Remember all sort of funky things happened at the Norwood plant when these cars were being put together (the best example would have to be the Fisher trim tags stamped with the "NBR" opposed to the correct "NOR". This goes to show the assembly guys really didn't a hoot what went onto these beauties!! The best way to verify if it is a true SS car would have to be looking at the tubes coming out of the heater core (396 BB has tubes coming out of the middle of the heater, whereas SB has tubes coming out of the right side of it), the rear exhaust hanger/plate mounted on the left rear frame rail. The best obvious one would have to be trying to do a title search at the DMV. If you have any luck you might be able to get ahold one of the previous owners who can give you some insight.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-12-2003, 08:30 PM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,074
Thanks: 2
Thanked 760 Times in 356 Posts
Default Re: Is it an SS or Original 396 Car?

Hate to say, it's a swapped tag. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Real close to fitting either build date (68 or 69), but it really only fits 9/68, VIN is 9/69. Does the original color match the trim tag?

Noone in the plant ever looked at the trim tag after Fisher Body was done with the car. Fisher was pretty consistent, and even their errors were normally consistent.
And in general, strange things did not happen on the production line. It was a standard process, had to be, they built 243,085 in 69. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-13-2003, 04:05 AM
HuggerSS396 HuggerSS396 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Thomasville PA
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it an SS or Original 396 Car?

The original color on the car was orange and the interior is standard black. This matches the trim tag. What would somebody gain in this case by swapping the trim tag? The heater hose comes out in the middle of the box. Before I really start to bring her back to life could I at least find out if the car had the SS option or was just a base car with fake SS emblems.
Josh
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-13-2003, 12:43 PM
Jeff H Jeff H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 2,454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: Is it an SS or Original 396 Car?

How many fuel lines are there going back to the gas tank? If it was an SS350, 396/325 or 396/350hp engine, it should have 2 fuel lines. Did you check the information on the TH400 to see if that is the original transmission?
__________________
69 Z28 JL8, #'s match - being restored
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.