Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Dealer Specific Discussion > COPO - United States


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-30-2004, 06:03 PM
Rowdy Rat Rowdy Rat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: East Berlin, PA
Posts: 158
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Chevrolet Vehicle Records

I'm curious if there have been any further developments regarding the project Jim Mattison was working on... The collection/distribution of Chevrolet vehicle records.

Last comments that I heard indicated that there was some sort of disagreement between Jim and Chevrolet management.

Has any further progress been made on this project?

Regards,

Stan Falenski
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 07-01-2004, 01:35 AM
LarryB LarryB is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Chevrolet Vehicle Records

I'm interested in how this turns out. I've been lurking on this board for about a year now following the Jim mattison thread
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2004, 02:40 AM
TDW TDW is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 1,948
Thanks: 27
Thanked 38 Times in 22 Posts
Default Re: Chevrolet Vehicle Records

I was under the impression the Motown was pretty close to JM. Can you chime in here Motown?
__________________
Tony
55 Nomad Gasser
70 SS 427 Nova
34 Ford Sedan..Hemi powered
Michigan/ Florida
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-01-2004, 03:21 AM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,483
Thanks: 70
Thanked 2,663 Times in 1,181 Posts
Default Re: Chevrolet Vehicle Records

I talked to JM a few weeks ago.
He told me that a new Regime,if you will,came into power and put this project on hold,temporarily.
Sometimes barely moving ahead one step,only to then take 3 steps backwards.
This is not uncommon,as it happens so often over there,he as lost count.People retire or Move on,and new positions are filled,and thus re-evaluated.I know everyone here puts Jims project in High Priority,but the powers that be could barely care less,& that added to the project itself,is what takes up so much Time.
Be Patient.....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-2004, 12:28 PM
Chris396 Chris396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Missouri
Posts: 406
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Chevrolet Vehicle Records

GM seems to be run like the government.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2004, 04:52 PM
Pantera Pantera is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tulsa OKLA
Posts: 1,337
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Chevrolet Vehicle Records

AAAhhh they are not "THAT BAD"....!!!!!
__________________
70 BM Phase III GT Vette
69 BM SS427 GT vette?
69 L78 Nova 7k mi
73 Pantera
69 Vette B/P SCCA
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-2004, 08:15 PM
MikeA MikeA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 822
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Chevrolet Vehicle Records

[ QUOTE ]
GM seems to be run like the government.

[/ QUOTE ]

If GM was run like the government they would say the records exist but just can not find them!
__________________
Mike

1970 Yenko Deuce, YS-84
1972 Nova SS
1987 Grand National
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-01-2004, 09:19 PM
396L35's Avatar
396L35 396L35 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Herculaneum, MO
Posts: 1,807
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Chevrolet Vehicle Records

If GM was run like the government they would be BROKE!!!!!
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-06-2004, 12:29 PM
indyjps indyjps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oswego IL
Posts: 437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Chevrolet Vehicle Records

i work for GM, the government runs smoothly in comparison, all the threads that ive seen about changes in production line confusion and mid year changes and engine dates not matching a certain build frame on never restored cars make total sense to me. the old production rule of first in first out still gets thrown off at times. when you consider several million cars per year across many plants and usually three shifts sometimes things dont add up. late shipments and in house repair to bring small imperfections up to the quality standards explain many of the inconsistencies in vehicles that i see members debate about over and over.
__________________
69 camaro
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.