![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could it be possible that a rearend could have left the plant with no prefix or production date stamped on it. Has anyone heard of this ever happening? Thanks
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you talking about the sand casting date on the pumpkin, or the axle tubes? Please fill out profile. Thanks, Sam
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Sam, Wanting to know about the axle tube stampings. I don't talk on this site much. But I've been on it for years learning about supercars. You guys are very knowledgeable about musclecars and hope I can get an answer here. Thanks Kelly
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Come on guys, I know someone out there must have some info on this subject. Can I get some help on this. Thanks Kelly
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kelly,
I have seen a few rears like this. Two were early Chevy II, one was for 67 camaro, and one was for 68/69 camaro. Two of the rears had later revised center castings. The 67 camaro housing was a "341NF" center and one of the Chevy II rears was a "860NF". I would assume that GM made them for other cars. I sold the 68/69 rear for $2000, in the original crate. The guy with the Chevy II rear is asking more than twice that for his. But beware of "retubed" rears ![]() I hope this helps. ![]() Eric |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Eric for the information. This is a rearend for a 69 camaro. The guy says its dated late 68, that is possible for a 69 camaro I think.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I'm not mistaken axle tube replacement from accedent damage was a common practice when these cars where new or newer.
|
![]() |
|
|