![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
looks good however the t and p have a ballbat looking effect I think that would be a stamp signature that couldn't be duplicated so it would either be correct or not but im in no way a expert [/ QUOTE ] That effect is the result of the stamp being made while the gang-stamp holder was tilted slightly away from the block. Note that the entire stamping is deeper on the bottom than on the top. Not uncommon on real stampings.
__________________
1969 Chevelle SS396 L78 M22 4:10 Tuxedo Black 1970 LS3 Malibu 400 BB convertible 1970 LS3 Malibu 400 BB coupe 1970 Chevelle 300 series LS3 400 BB coupe, special order Monaco Orange 1970 Chevelle Concours Estate LS3 400 BB wagon 1970 Chevelle SS396 L78 M21 3:55 Tuxedo Black |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It would be the only known Kansas-built COPO-Chevelle. Start looking for the rest of the car !
__________________
Anders Stålklint. After selling my COPO 9561 I´m now a "postman" with the main project being a 1966 327 2 dr sedan Chevy II. ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Goes to show you, once in a while, you can still make a good score!
__________________
Rich Pern 69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier" |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm curious to know if you feel a belly where a CON VIN was removed,as was stated back by these two who saw this block at SCR9.
https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/showflat...true#Post228583 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that is what ie was illustrating with the straight edge. There is no belly. It looks to me that they were saying the assembly date was removed, not the Consecutive VIN.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I *think* the belly discussion was regarding the MP stamping, and as can clearly be seen in the photo's with the head off there is no belly.
Several people were telling me the MP stamp was a fake. So, the only way to really tell I was told is to remove the head (427 King). Which I did, and after that any doubt was allayed by the three experts. In fact, one got tired of looking at the pics and stated that he had told me several times it was real. ![]() The three experts are: 1. Kurt Sonin (sp) 2. Jerry MacNeish 3. Jeff (Pacecarjeff) As far as the VIN being a restamp, I can find no evidence of a belly there either. The "rough" areas are consistent throughout, by that I mean that the rough texture is not smoothed out more by the vin stamp then the rest of the pad area. It is a "little" more smooth than the surrounding cast by the oil filter area, due to sanding. Although I really don't care (for my purposes), as this is going into my 69 camaro from High School that I recently found. It is a real MP stmping, then it is a L72 and either came out of a chevelle or a camaro. Several of the accepted "experts" have looked at HiRes close ups and have given it the thumbs up ![]() I'll try and snap some better photo's of the VIN with a straight edge soon and post. ![]() Rich
__________________
Rich Pern 69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier" |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Also, I am told that the VIN and the Assembly dates are within the expected date ranges, so that helps as well.
__________________
Rich Pern 69 Camaro COPO "Tin Soldier" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well it sounds and looks like you found the real deal so have fun and engoy ,also congrats!!!
![]() |
![]() |
|
|