![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The seller does an admirable job stating that he believes this car is a clone that has had the VIN on 'one or more components' altered. Very interesting, but even as a clone, I'm guessing it will easily eclipse $50k as even the 318 cars are pretty scarce.
So, if this car's VIN didn't originally include the V engine code, I'm wondering how this would have been done. Possibly, a new VIN tag, plus an Alabama title? You don't often see an auction description conclude with this phrase: "The winning bidder/buyer will sign a notarized hold harmless agreement, stating they are aware that the car is represented as an altered, non-numbers matching unit." Link to 1970 'Cuda Convertible auction BS27V0B268019 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I thought it looked familiar. Here it is at the Chicopee, Mass, Northeast Hemi Owners national meet in May 1984.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to njsteve For This Useful Post: | ||
L_e_e (08-11-2020), PeteLeathersac (08-11-2020) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve, since this is in your wheelhouse and you saw the car that long ago, any thoughts about the VIN/possible clone confliction?
__________________
Bill Pritchard 73 Camaro RS Z28, L82, M20, C60 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess the car has popped up before on eBay and there is a thread on it here: https://forum.e-bodies.org/index.php...;topicseen#new
Looks like it probably was a rebody way back in the day, even before my photos. |
The Following User Says Thank You to njsteve For This Useful Post: | ||
Bill Pritchard (08-11-2020) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now the seller's 'CYA agreement' is eminently clear.
__________________
Bill Pritchard 73 Camaro RS Z28, L82, M20, C60 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Even back in 1983 I thought the smallblock radiator support was a hint that things weren't quite right
|
![]() |
|
|