![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Beautiful unused 1960s vintage Blue Streak tire in the desirable 5.50/9.75-15 size. Very hard to find though I’m recommending it be used as garage art or static display due to age. Tough to find NOS; looking for $600 plus the ride or a good offer.
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to scuncio For This Useful Post: | ||
1967Z28 (08-02-2025), dykstra (Yesterday), juliosz (08-02-2025), napa68 (08-02-2025), olredalert (08-01-2025) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
----So cool, Tony! If I had an extra 15 by 7 TT-D's magnesium wheel (I have 4 now) I would love to have this mounted for the cave....Bill S
|
The Following User Says Thank You to olredalert For This Useful Post: | ||
scuncio (08-01-2025) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks, Bill!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gonna show off my ignorance here. It's not like I could hide it anyway.
I don't get the tire size designations. I understand old tires (like 7.60 15). Section width of 7.6 inches for 15 inch rim. Virtually all were 78 aspect ratio, so that spec wasn't even listed. Can someone splain? Is 9.75 the section width (would guess that is close from the pictures)? And does 5.5 have something to do with aspect ratio? Too bad you don't have a pair of these Tony. Looks killer.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No expert either, but I believe the 5.5 is tread width and 9.75 is the sidewall, I.E. section width.
Beautiful tire, wish they were reproduced, but even if they were, I couldn't afford a set anyway... ![]()
__________________
Mitch 1970 Chevelle SS 1966 Chevelle SS 1967 Camaro ss/rs 1938 Business coupe, street rod 2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe the 5.50 is the tire height and this would be a 25.5" tall tire or thereabouts.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 1967Z28 For This Useful Post: | ||
Too Many Projects (08-02-2025) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That makes sense. Tread width looks much wider than 5.5".
Have not seen that format before.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for the info, gents!
|