![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey Guys,
What was the difference between the early production L-72 with 450HP (in my Vette) vrs. the later production L-72 with 425 HP. I am guessing the cam was different but I am not 100% sure. Thanks. -Dan
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mbcgarage/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Same cam, same engine, Corvette to Corvette, just a different rating.
Remember the first L-78s(396s)in the Corvettes were rated at 425hp and the new 427s certainly had to have more HP [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/burnout.gif[/img] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to the Chevy by the Numbers book, the '66 had more cam duration, different heads w/slightly larger combustion chamber in the head, and a different intake than the later L-72s. Kind of nit-picky stuff, and I honestly can't say if any of it makes any difference. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A friend worked on the line in the fall of '65 when the first L72 "B" body cars came down the line. For a short time they had 450 hp decals. Then they were changed to 425 hp. Through the early sixties all the manufacturers were playing a number oneupmanship game. It appears to be more of a numbers game than anything else. Perhaps reality finally set in as the new ratings were more in line with actual output. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/burnout.gif[/img]
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now. ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I had the Corvette at a local show this past weekend and a guy with a Mosport Green 425HP coupe asked me what the difference between the engines were. I told him, honestly, just don't know.
Thanks guys.. I knew someone out there would know the answer. I did not know that the original 1965 Corvettes had L-78 engines. Chevrolet did a good job with the changing of the HP ratings; got me. -Dan
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mbcgarage/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have restored 5 '66 Corvette's w/ L-72's Serial #'s from under 1000 tru 20,000. No difference in any parts of the motors were found. I have heard 2 stories as to the reason for the 25 hp "de-tune".
First Insurance reasons. Second Chevy execs. knew the L-71 was coming out the following year and they thought it wiser to go back to 425 and go up from there than up from 450 with the rating of the L-71. Also at this rate the L-S6 would have to have been rated around 500 hp. As a side note all 5 motors were run on the dyno after stock spec rebuilds and they all made between 470-480 hp and 480-500 ft lbs of torque. |
![]() |
|
|