Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-01-2004, 06:38 PM
Z28DZ Z28DZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 424
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Is a "Clone' better?

It would seem so, according to this seller. Any info on this car? PS - nice feedback rating, too.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...;category=6161


Reply With Quote
Attachments - The Supercar Registry 82537-yenko.jpg 82112-jbbyenko1.jpg 82084-Scan10001.JPG
O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 05-01-2004, 08:19 PM
427TJ's Avatar
427TJ 427TJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PNW
Posts: 5,578
Thanks: 1,007
Thanked 293 Times in 163 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

Are clones better? It depends on what you're in it for. They're certainly not worth the big bucks--perhaps "medium" bucks. Clones can be really cool if done correctly and they can be driven with much less worry about accidental damage. As in everything, it's the attention to detail that makes the car. If it's done correctly down to the last detail (except VIN, cowl tag, paperwork) but you admit it's a clone car, no one SHOULD hassle you. But, if you're in it for the prestige of owning a "Yenko" then you might be disappointed. You'll be known as the guy with the clone and they'll say it with a hint of disgust. Well-done clones get compliments but most of the guys are likely holding back their disdain for cloning Supercars like the Yenko. They'll walk up to you at a show and compliment your car and then out of earshot they'll piss all over it. Hey, it's a competitive world (and hobby) and if you don't mind being the guy with the clone then you'll probably have a lot of fun with a car like this. I know I would.

This month's Hot Rod has more from David Freiburger on the level of discourse in the hobby: "If there's one thing all car guys have in common, it's opinions. Not agreement, but opinions."

Build a clone or buy a clone, drive it and enjoy it, and ignore the intelligentsia that constantly tries to ruin your fun with their opinions.

This is just my opionion, of course!

Oh, and what is it about putting '67 caps on '68-up Camaros? Oh, and '68-up caps on '67s? You'd think that after all that work a guy would get the caps right.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2004, 09:12 PM
copo69's Avatar
copo69 copo69 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 525
Thanks: 61
Thanked 75 Times in 19 Posts
Default 69 Yenko all # matching clone

69 Yenko all # matching clone.......oxymoron?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2004, 06:20 AM
hvychev hvychev is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 3,668
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 28 Posts
Default Re: 69 Yenko all # matching clone

Here is my take on the whole clone NIGHTMARE of a topic. Here is the definition as it appears in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary...

Main Entry: 1clone
Pronunciation: 'klOn
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek klOn twig, slip; akin to Greek klan to break -- more at CLAST
2 : one that appears to be a copy of an original form <a clone of a personal computer>

"copy of an original" That means not some dumb ass Pro Street 69 Camaro with Yenko Stripes, or even a completely correct Yenko Camaro clone but in red or black, or some POS look alike that has Weld wheels and a big ugly black Autometer tach, etc.

For the record I don't think there is anything wrong with a clone as long as it is done right!!!!! Please everyone stop contributing to the stupidity!!!!!!
__________________
Frank Magallon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2004, 07:37 AM
rpoz11's Avatar
rpoz11 rpoz11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 701
Thanks: 10
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: 69 Yenko all # matching clone

Well, if was able to drive my #'s PaceCar without worry of other idiot drivers around me, then I would so! However, I, myself, cannot take the financial risk nor the chance to drive my car in the traffic we have here down in the LA basin! But! I will do so in the event of a local show, where as I am aware of my routes taken and familiarity to those who drive within these cities. As for a clone, my PaceCar is enough for me to consider not buying another just to watch it sit some more. So, for me, building a clone of the 69 Camaro design to drive on a regular basis is my choice rather than take the risk in the lost investment of a documented COPO, Yenko, or what have you. I would be just too nervous to ever enjoy that documented car; My clone is for personal enjoyment and the opportunity to actually drive it without worry!
__________________
Chavez Ravine
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2004, 07:43 AM
rpoz11's Avatar
rpoz11 rpoz11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 701
Thanks: 10
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

However, I do have a problem with restamped blocks( in this situation ), etc...And: with a VIN of 124379Lxxxxxx,--> L <--, and the advertising of having the X22 code REALLY troubles me! .........The following is a copy/paste 'paragraph' of the seller's description:[Headliner door panels, seats, carpet package, dash pad, also the dash cluster is like new all dash lights and wiring has been rebuilt correct Hurst shifter that works great console has been rebuilt all window, door handles, and fans replaced.The paint and body on this Yenko is second to none the body lines and fit on doors hood trunk fenders is all in next to perfect also every part inside the engine is balanced and blueprinted to perfect condition also this car is a original Daytona yellow car the code 76-76 us Daytona yellow also the X22 is a factory big block carb]... ...Lastly; I guess as if one desires to place that much in finances for the final product shown, to me it wouldnt seem to hard to sorta try to better describe exactly what is shown--although it's quite obvious there has been quite an effort to get this to look so nice!....just my thoughts
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-02-2004, 10:29 AM
KLONECO KLONECO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 294
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 69 Yenko all # matching clone

very surprised at you ,,,,,,,,,FRANKLY!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2004, 09:39 PM
Canucklehead Canucklehead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton/Alberta/Canada
Posts: 854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 69 Yenko all # matching clone

I found it strange the way this add is worded. It seems he's trying to convince you that his clone is BETTER then the real thing. Almost to the point that he's conviced his clone is not a clone. This whole clone thing seems wrong to me. If you don't have an original then you just have a customized camaro, stop with this whole clone thing, especially when you get one of these clowns taking an original # matching car to pull apart and make a clone out of it and then ask more money than what the original stated out as. Take for example these hemi cuda clones. They take a nice $50k car drop in a $10k hemi, then they want $150k for it. Well it's basically an original nothing and they want all the glue for it like it's something spectacular or something?????, i don't get it
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-04-2004, 09:33 AM
tom406 tom406 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Newcastle, WA USA
Posts: 2,105
Thanks: 379
Thanked 3,318 Times in 722 Posts
Default No mo' clones for me...

I just got rid of a pretty nice '66 Shelby GT350H clone. Most of the cloning was done prior to me getting it, I just added some fun bits like a 5 speed and some power disc brakes. Up side, besides the lower cost of admission, is that you do these modern upgrades without a second thought. Even though I love the drivability upgrades, my inner purist always fights me when I have a "real" car. I loved driving the car, but hated parking it and fielding the "is it real" questions. You say no, and their disappointment is palpable, but you can't lie, or you'll just be another schmuck who lies about his clone. Not worth it to me. I'd rather have a nice Camaro/Mustang or whatever rather than a clone of a Yenko or Shelby. I'm not telling people what they have to like, but I personally don't enjoy the clone/tribute car ownership experience.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-04-2004, 07:16 PM
Canucklehead Canucklehead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton/Alberta/Canada
Posts: 854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: No mo' clones for me...

I agree, why can't you be happy with just a customized car?. Why put the clone moniker on it and then have to field the enevitable raft of questions. I don't see why that would be any less enjoyable.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.